Posted on 08/11/2009 6:41:03 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
and the fact that Obama fires IG’s that were doing their job is just not even worth reporting???????
Media is dead.
This story could not have come out at a better time for the GOP. The Dems probably think though that it’s good timing for them because they need another diversion.
What they are not mentioning is that while President, Bush did fire some...but Clinton fired all of them. I haven't checked that, but I remember hearing that the last time the socialists...I mean 'rats brought this up.
More likely Obama will send in one of his closer friends to bomb the Times building to the ground.
“Internal e-mail messages in the spring of 2005 at the White House showed that there was widespread unhappiness with David Iglesias, the United States attorney in New Mexico, because of the perception among top Republicans that he was dragging his feet on voter fraud and corruption investigations involving Democrats.”
Refusal to do one’s job sounds like grounds for firing to me. I don’t get it.
Oh, yeah. SO?
Hey Dhimmies! Look up “serves at the pleasure of the President.” Then go take a bath with a plugged-in toaster.
Yaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnn...............
Clinton fired appointees from the previous opposite party administration. This is not an uncommon practice for an incoming president in his first term and under those same circumstances Reagan, George H.W.Bush and George W. Bush did it as well.
This whole case began when Bush took the unusually rare step of firing several of his own appointees in his second term. While it was his right to do so, questions were initiated and it snowballed.
“He didn’t get rid of enough of them.”
....I couldn’t agree more!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.