Skip to comments.
Santorum dips toes in 2012 Iowa waters
Politico ^
| 8/11/09
| Jon Martin
Posted on 08/11/2009 6:04:12 PM PDT by pissant
Add former Sen. Rick Santorum to the list of potential 2012 Republican presidential candidates.
POLITICO has learned Santorum will visit first-in-the-nation Iowa this fall for a series of appearances before the sort of conservative activists who dominate the state GOPs key presidential caucuses.
The Pennsylvanian, who lost his 2006 re-election bid, will visit Iowa on October 1st, appearing on a Des Moines radio talk show and speaking to a luncheon and workshop of Iowas Right to Life group before heading east to Dubuque, where hell headline a fundraiser for the conservative Americas Future Fund PAC and then speak about the future of the GOP to a public audience in the Mississippi River city.
Your voice becomes more amplified when you go to a place like Iowa or New Hampshire, Santorum explained in an interview Tuesday about the visit.
Like other potential White House aspirants, he insisted it was too early to consider a presidential run. But he acknowledged that he was interested in taking a higher profile in the party.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2012election; 2012gopprimary; culturewar; getsantorum; homosexualagenda; ia2012; lavendermafia; lawrencevtexas; ricksantorum; santorum; santorum2012; slipperyslope; socialconservative
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: HiramQuick
No kidding.....he learned a VERY valuable lesson....NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT, which is what Specter was/is.
21
posted on
08/11/2009 6:21:19 PM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: pissant
Again, NO white guy is going to beat o in 2012,IMHO
To: pissant
From
OnTheIssues:
They have him listed as a hard-right conservative, however, given the votes I have highlighted below, I am not sure just how hard-right he is.
1. Voted NO on prohibiting job discrimination by sexual orientation. (Sep 1996)
2. Voted NO on banning affirmative action hiring with federal funds.
3. Voted NO on ending special funding for minority & women-owned business.
4. Voted NO on setting aside 10% of highway funds for minorities & women.
5. Voted NO on repealing tax subsidy for companies which move US jobs offshore.
6. Voted YES on targeting 100,000 hydrogen-powered vehicles by 2010.
7. Voted NO on killing a bill for trade sanctions if China sells weapons.
8. Voted NO on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence.
9. Voted YES on limiting self-employment health deduction. 10. Voted NO on restricting business with entities linked to terrorism. (Jul 2005)
11. Voted YES on allowing another round of military base closures. (May 1999)
12. Voted YES on cutting nuclear weapons below START levels. (May 1999)
13. Voted YES on banning chemical weapons. (Apr 1997)
14. Voted YES on restoring $550M in funding for Amtrak for 2007.
To: SoConPubbie
He’s a soft conservative. Finger in the air a bit too much.
24
posted on
08/11/2009 6:22:54 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Ann Archy
And that is his “Mark Of Cain”. He forever doomed himself with the Conservative diehards.
But he not a RINO by any means.
25
posted on
08/11/2009 6:24:06 PM PDT
by
Yorlik803
( If this be treason, then lets make the best of it.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; pissant
Too socially conservative for me. I want a fiscal conservative-libertarian and strong on national defense and the borders. Plus the fact he endorsed Specter pretty much killed his career.
Now that is a surprise.
I've taken you as a social conservative all this time.
How disappointing...
To: Yorlik803
He is NOT a RINO,,,,he made one big mistake.....I will forgive him...hope Penns. will.
27
posted on
08/11/2009 6:25:21 PM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: SoConPubbie; Extremely Extreme Extremist
EEE is a libertarian conservative of sorts. The problem with that is that the leaders of libertarian wing of conservatism are mostly fruit loops. A problem EEE recognizes. The most solid guys are almost always socons AND fiscons
28
posted on
08/11/2009 6:28:07 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
Rick Santorum’s presidential campaign will no doubt get about as far as Jim Gilmore’s.
29
posted on
08/11/2009 6:31:06 PM PDT
by
Loyalist
(If a tree falls in the forest, and the media is not there to cover it, does it make a headline?)
To: Loyalist
30
posted on
08/11/2009 6:32:16 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
Will he bring in his Socialist buddies Specter and Slick Willard to stump for him ?
31
posted on
08/11/2009 6:39:28 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: Ann Archy
Didn’t his backing of Sphincter ultimately do-in Toomey in that race - Toomey was ahead in the polls until that endorsement?
32
posted on
08/11/2009 6:44:02 PM PDT
by
FrdmLvr
To: Ann Archy
Is the senate or representative seat from his state up for grabs in 2010? See if he can will again there, or as governor. We don't need a another young politician running for the big ball of wax in 2012, do we?
33
posted on
08/11/2009 6:56:12 PM PDT
by
boatbums
(Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life!)
34
posted on
08/11/2009 7:06:04 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: pissant
Agreed, and let’s face it. A candidate who cannot carry his home state should not be on the ticket...
even Mondale carried his own state in ‘84.
To: Yorlik803
To compare him with Mitt or RINOs isnt true. I agree, he doesn't rise to Romney standards.
He could be a good cabinet secretary or something.
36
posted on
08/11/2009 7:10:06 PM PDT
by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
("It (Gov't) can't make you happier, healthier, wealthier, and wise" - Sarah Palin 07/26)
To: pissant
Let’s just hope we have candidates to split the RINO vote—instead of candidates to split the conservative vote. That’s the name of the game in the primaries.
To: 9YearLurker
Let’s hope the frontrunners are ALL conservatives. I think people are ready for Reaganism, part II. No more damn Rudy McRombees.
38
posted on
08/11/2009 7:14:37 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: SoConPubbie
I am socially conservative. I support pro-life and pro-traditional values/marriage politicians.
What I don't like is Republicans pushing nanny-state, big-government laws like banning online gambling, tobacco bans, or going after porn. It's just more statism under the guise of conservatism.
39
posted on
08/11/2009 7:16:01 PM PDT
by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
("It (Gov't) can't make you happier, healthier, wealthier, and wise" - Sarah Palin 07/26)
To: pissant
Awesome!
Santorum is hated by the socialists.
Go Rick GO!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson