Skip to comments.
Republicans can do better than a man with ambiguous stances [Romney]
SF Examiner ^
| 8-11-2009
| Opinion
Posted on 08/11/2009 7:59:51 AM PDT by Brookhaven
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Driving home yesterday listening to the radio (a well known conservative host), he said Mitt Romney would be on soon to talk about Obama's health care plan. I thought my head would explode! Romeny talking about health care?
It seems the left in SF has figured Romney out (as the above opinon piece shows.) How is it conservatives commentators (Limbaugh, Hannity, Hewitt, Ingram, etc...) haven't? They defer to Romney as though he is the reincarnation of Ronald Reagan. I don't get it.
In the NFL draft they have a saying: "Looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane" to describe someone that looks great at first glance, but is really a different type of player than their outside apperance would indicate.
The same can be applied to Romney: "Looks like Ronald Reagan, governs like Ron Reagan."
To: Brookhaven
I posted before and I will posted it every time the subject of Mitt Romney and the 2012 election comes up, my worse fear is that we take back the Congress in 2010 and be in good position to win back the White House in 2012 and then the Republican Party pulls a '1996' on us and nominates a 'Bob Dole' clone (aka Mitt Romney) and we get 4 more years of 'Zero'!
2
posted on
08/11/2009 8:04:48 AM PDT
by
Kartographer
(".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
To: Brookhaven
Earth to DF examiner, Sarah didn’t flameout.
3
posted on
08/11/2009 8:07:29 AM PDT
by
east1234
(It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
To: east1234
4
posted on
08/11/2009 8:08:15 AM PDT
by
east1234
(It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
To: Kartographer
Romney is doing all the right political things to get the nomination. He is positioning himself well. The state run socialist propaganda machine know exactly what he is about, and will “arrange” it so that he is the GOP nominee.
Kind of like how we wound up with McLame last time.
It will be Romney v. 0bama in 2012.
5
posted on
08/11/2009 8:11:53 AM PDT
by
henkster
(The frog has noticed the increase in water temperature)
To: henkster
I can only pray that you are wrong! 8 years of ‘Zero’ will leave us with a a third world ‘Amerika’.
6
posted on
08/11/2009 8:14:03 AM PDT
by
Kartographer
(".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
To: east1234
After a season of discontent, the limited-government movement has finally found its voice rallying opposition to the planned federal takeover of health care. Why, then, would the right line up behind the architect of the reform scheme thats served as a model for Obamacare?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I’m not sure who will emerge (Sarah perhaps), but the author is right with this statement. Health care has been the final straw that has pushed many over the edge (and from moderate over to the conservatives.) Romney would be an awful candidate to attempt to draw their votes.
7
posted on
08/11/2009 8:14:21 AM PDT
by
Brookhaven
(And in their desperation, they turned to a man they fully did not understand--Rise of the Joker)
To: Brookhaven
If Romney was President today, we’d of had socialized medicine by the end of spring.
8
posted on
08/11/2009 8:15:10 AM PDT
by
Boiling Pots
(Angry Mobster)
To: Brookhaven
Agreed, nominating “moderates” is what got us in this mess.
9
posted on
08/11/2009 8:18:42 AM PDT
by
east1234
(It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
To: henkster
It will be Romney v. 0bama in 2012.
No it won't. Romney won't get the nomination. And if (God forbid!) he does, there will be a strong conservative 3rd party candidate running who I will work for and vote for.
10
posted on
08/11/2009 8:20:45 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(I hereby pledge not to allow media whores to pick the GOP candidate in 2012.)
To: Kartographer
Believe me, I DON’T want Romney! But look at how our political system has been picking our candidates since 1988. It seems every four years we ask ourselves “out of 250-300 million people, this is the best we can do?”
Our political system is a very flawed reflection of a society that has gone seriously askew. So Romney-Obama is about what I’ve come to expect.
11
posted on
08/11/2009 8:25:53 AM PDT
by
henkster
(The frog has noticed the increase in water temperature)
To: Brookhaven
Im not sure who will emerge (Sarah perhaps), but the author is right with this statement. Health care has been the final straw that has pushed many over the edge (and from moderate over to the conservatives.) Romney would be an awful candidate to attempt to draw their votes.
Indeed. America will be looking for a firebrand opposing all this garbage. The mantra should be: "Who knew that "change" meant more of the same, but worse? Time for REAL change in DC."
12
posted on
08/11/2009 8:29:32 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(I hereby pledge not to allow media whores to pick the GOP candidate in 2012.)
To: henkster
A note to the Republican Party: You will not get either my money or my vote if Romney is on the ticket. I am sick of finger-in-the-wind political hacks and will not support or vote for them.
13
posted on
08/11/2009 8:30:06 AM PDT
by
pt17
To: Brookhaven
Even before the recent Sarah Palin and Mark Sanford flameouts, Romney looked like the rights favorite son for 2012. I saw no flames from Sarah Palin. However, I see fire in the eyes of her supporters.
14
posted on
08/11/2009 8:30:39 AM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(You're either in or in the way.)
To: henkster
It will never be Romney — too many Republicans detest him and his healthcare in MA will make him flame out. He holds Town Halls just like a Democrat — only supporters/staffers are allowed to ask questions and they are down in front.
Romney is too liberal pretending to be conservative and it shows. Slick needs to stay out of the Presidential race period because he can never get elected. Ask his buddy Istook how much he lost to our Doofus RAT Governor in 2006 — almost 2-1 and this is Oklahoma.
15
posted on
08/11/2009 8:33:46 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn/Rubio - Senate 2010 ! Take Back the House/Senate! Stop ZERO!)
To: henkster
It will be Romney v. 0bama in 2012.
Now that's a real devil and the deep blue sea moment...
16
posted on
08/11/2009 8:33:50 AM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
To: Brookhaven
Republicans can do better than a man with ambiguous stances Well, maybe.
Maybe not.
To: Brookhaven
Even before the recent Sarah Palin...flameouts Stopped right there. BS ALERT!
18
posted on
08/11/2009 8:38:10 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(We have the right to debate and disagree with any administration - Hillary Clinton)
To: Brookhaven
I knew who the author was talking about just by the title. Mitt needs to crawl under a rock somewhere and never come out.
19
posted on
08/11/2009 8:39:53 AM PDT
by
oldvike
To: PhiKapMom
Get in your time machine. Go back four years. Re-post your post. Change “Romney” to “McCain,” change “healthcare” to “immigration.”
I rest my case.
Unless we can get our primaries closed to registered republicans, this will happen again.
20
posted on
08/11/2009 8:41:14 AM PDT
by
henkster
(The frog has noticed the increase in water temperature)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson