Replies

I watched that video, and felt the racial undertones myself. The rep was snarling at a white guy, saying that the meeting was for "his constituents"--any reason he assumed that the white guy was not a constituent? Turned out, he was, and had attempted to contact Scott several times previous with questions.

The rep was snarling at a white guy, saying that the meeting was for "his constituents"--any reason he assumed that the white guy was not a constituent? Turned out, he was, and had attempted to contact Scott several times previous with questions.

I've noticed a trend in demoRats responses to the town hall confrontations. They seem to be redefining "constituent" to mean someone who voted for them, not someone who lives in their district.

This follows closely to Marx's response to a question about anyone who didn't want to be a part of the socialist revolution, where he said to disenfranchise them, confiscate their property and don't allow them to buy or sell.

Saying something as factual and true as, “0bama’s people,” can provoke cries of racism. But the truth is they are 0bama’s people.

The April day the DHS security issued that memo identifying characteristics of extremists, terrorists etc. We ceased being constituents of the President, the Administration, or Congress. Whether we fully realized it at the time or not, we had been classified as enemies of the state.

So today we are a people without representation, without recourse, and in many ways without a country. I am sure there will be fervent cries of foul regarding my statement, but when one finally comes to terms with the fact the people who control our country are: Oathbreakers, have no intention of following our laws, nor being held accountable to our laws, one will realize our country fails to exist except for what is in our hearts.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2312371/posts?page=37#37