Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Safrguns

Usually, I just hand them a copy of the pdf (either on line or in person) and tell them they can look up the references. Every one of these items can be easily found in the pdf. I think more of US have read this monstrosity than congress.


6 posted on 08/10/2009 5:17:59 PM PDT by MizSterious (Impeach Barak "let them eat cake" Obama, while there's still something of our Republic to save.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious

I think more of US have read this monstrosity than congress.
_________________________________________________

You bet your britches they haven’t read it. Too much WORK and not enough ‘liquid and country club lunches’.


17 posted on 08/10/2009 5:30:17 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Obama. Clear and Pres__ent Danger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious

>>> Usually, I just hand them a copy of the pdf (either on line or in person) and tell them they can look up the references.

I have a copy now, and i’m looking at the first point from the first summary....

Page 22 does not mandate audits.... let alone ALL self insuring employers.

It does talk about a study that gathers information (which may be an indirect “hint” that some companies may be audited to get the info. But the words “Audit” or “Mandate” does not occur.

At the end of page 22, and into 23 is where the results of the study will be used to “Make Recommendations” to ensure that incentives for self-insuring does not exist.

Help me out here... what am I missing?


18 posted on 08/10/2009 5:30:23 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson