I agree with you about Sarah being right. I think Neil is one of the good guys but I *was* surprised by his line of questioning like I said.
He always seems to be truthful to me so maybe he just doesn't think bringing words like "evil" into the discussion helps the debate. I don't know what's in his head and I can't defend him much in this particular case.
Just to make my own position clear: I *do* use the word "evil" to describe this healthcare (deathcare) plan. Neil will have to defend himself beyond my own feeling that he is generally right on and I respect him a great deal. :0)
Yeah, I don’t understand why he took issue with the word “evil” of course it’s evil. He is going to allow the elderly and young children who are mentally and physically disabled end up paying the price. Obama is BEYOND evil, but I can’t think of another word worse then evil right now..
The words of Ezekial Emmanuel:
When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most substantial chance,
whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated (figure). It therefore superficially resembles the proposal made by DAILY advocates; however, the complete lives system justify es preference to younger people because of priority to the worst-off rather than instrumental value. Additionally, the complete lives system assumes that, although life-years are equally valuable to all,
justice requires the fair distribution of them. Conversely, DAILY allocation treats life-years given to elderly or disabled people as objectively less valuable.
I am watching Glenn Beck, he said that Sarah is absolutely right and tomorrow will bring up the Death Panels. I think out of everyone on Fox News, Sarah watches Glenn Beck. I think she should go on his show