Replies

"But we should know. The point has little to do with whether Obama was born in Hawaii. I’m quite confident that he was."

How can you be? You have no PROOF!! In fact, his Kenyan grandmother unequivocally states she remembers well the date and exact spot he was born. You go to great lengths to prove the grandmothers honesty, then dismiss her allegations as to Soerto's birthplace?

You must get terrible migraines from your brain cells fighting against themselves.

The Birther's want Obozo to PROVE he is a natural born citizen. It is precisely because of all the lies and deception surrounding Obozo that this question be satisfied.

The COLB that Obama produced is NOT proof of being born in Hawaii, it is only proof of being born- somewhere. It does NOT state he was born in Hawaii, it only states the COLB was applied for and issued in Hawaii. ANYONE could get a COLB in Hawaii at the time, regardless of where they were born, or even a citizen of the USA. It is merely a certificate that is required for "residents" in Hawaii to produce if applying for things like welfare, or "foodstamps" to feed a family. You can't just claim you have 6 kids when you walk into the foodstamp store, or whereever it is that foodstamps and government cheese are handed out.

"How can you be? You have no PROOF!! "

And that is really the point. The so-called "revealed proofs" of Obama's supposed Hawaiian birth amount to essentially zero. NONE of them would be accepted as legal proof of natural-born citizenship. The ONLY legally-attested such proofs are the sworn statements that Obama made to the various state offices in charge of elections that he "satisified the requirements" to run for President.

This controversy is very easily eliminated. All that is necessary is for the Hawaiian "Director of Health" (or whatever her correct title is---the gal in charge of birth records) to issue a NOTARIZED STATEMENT to the effect that she has examined Obama's birth records, and he was, in fact, born on US soil. She could accomplish the same by going to any judge, being put under oath, and making a verbal statement to the same effect. THESE steps would constitute "proof". Newspaper birth announcements, on-line images, and similar items do not constitute PROOF.

" How can you be? You have no PROOF!! In fact, his Kenyan grandmother unequivocally states she remembers well the date and exact spot he was born. You go to great lengths to prove the grandmothers honesty, then dismiss her allegations as to Soerto's birthplace? "

You mean .. " You go to great lenghts to ( disprove the grandmother's honesty ) ....
When was the first time that his grandmother was to have stated this ? before the campaign ? during ? ...