Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nathan Zachary
"How can you be? You have no PROOF!! "

And that is really the point. The so-called "revealed proofs" of Obama's supposed Hawaiian birth amount to essentially zero. NONE of them would be accepted as legal proof of natural-born citizenship. The ONLY legally-attested such proofs are the sworn statements that Obama made to the various state offices in charge of elections that he "satisified the requirements" to run for President.

This controversy is very easily eliminated. All that is necessary is for the Hawaiian "Director of Health" (or whatever her correct title is---the gal in charge of birth records) to issue a NOTARIZED STATEMENT to the effect that she has examined Obama's birth records, and he was, in fact, born on US soil. She could accomplish the same by going to any judge, being put under oath, and making a verbal statement to the same effect. THESE steps would constitute "proof". Newspaper birth announcements, on-line images, and similar items do not constitute PROOF.

35 posted on 08/10/2009 7:00:08 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
"All that is necessary is for the Hawaiian "Director of Health" (or whatever her correct title is---the gal in charge of birth records) to issue a NOTARIZED STATEMENT to the effect that she has examined Obama's birth records, and he was, in fact, born on US soil. She could accomplish the same by going to any judge, being put under oath, and making a verbal statement to the same effect. THESE steps would constitute "proof". Newspaper birth announcements, on-line images, and similar items do not constitute PROOF."

I don't think that constitutes proof. Only hearsay. Because there is so much controversy surrounding the issue, so many that have already co-conspired with Obama to hide the information on his real birth records, that only the official birth record can satisfy the question.

There can be nothing "embarrassing" on his birth record, other than Obama not being who he claims to be, which would be a felony, wouldn't it. Or at the very least, expose one eventually.

Not being who you say you are, regardless if he is a natural born citizen or not, is a deception. There is a good chance that the people who voted for Obama -or whatever his name is- wouldn't have, had they known who and what he really was.

So even if he is a natural born citizen, the election would still have to be nullified, because he misrepresented himself.

42 posted on 08/10/2009 7:17:05 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Wonder Warthog

Merely verifying that he was born on us soil isn’t all we want to know.

They would LOVE to get away with merely satisfying that one question, and in fact have already attempted to do so. It isn’t really a lie, and if they weren’t asked if if his name was Barry Hussain Obama on the records, he’d get away with misrepresenting himself to the electorate.


44 posted on 08/10/2009 7:23:47 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson