Is there a change of counsel in this case ? I often wonder how long the resources can hold out with Orly and Keyes incurring continual expenses for travel and research. As far as I know, their only ongoing source of funding is from donations and unfortunately, when their case suffers a setback or their evidence is debunked, it could very well have an adverse impact on the generosity of their supporters.
Also, wasn’t there an announcement about one month ago that Atty. Stephen Pidgeon from WA was to become Orly’s new partner ? Atty. Pidgeon is well-versed in the entire Obama scandal and, as an experienced articulator, would be an excellent representative for TV and radio interviews.
Lastly, I read last week that Atty. Mario Apuzzo filed a motion disputing an objection with respect to the “standing” in his case by stating that the word “standing” does not appear anywhere in the U.S. Constitution.
PING! FYI, forwarded from message #10.
“Is there a change of counsel in this case ? I often wonder how long the resources can hold out with Orly and Keyes incurring continual expenses for travel and research. As far as I know, their only ongoing source of funding is from donations and unfortunately, when their case suffers a setback or their evidence is debunked, it could very well have an adverse impact on the generosity of their supporters.
Also, wasn’t there an announcement about one month ago that Atty. Stephen Pidgeon from WA was to become Orly’s new partner ? Atty. Pidgeon is well-versed in the entire Obama scandal and, as an experienced articulator, would be an excellent representative for TV and radio interviews.
Lastly, I read last week that Atty. Mario Apuzzo filed a motion disputing an objection with respect to the “standing” in his case by stating that the word “standing” does not appear anywhere in the U.S. Constitution.”
Ping - thanks...it’ll be much more interesting if this case gets additional talented legal assistance.