Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sovereignty2
"withholding federal funds"...
um,isn't that withholding money taken from the American taxpayer?
It's not FEDERAL money,it's the people's money to begin with!!
Whatever. Were I an Okie, i'd tell em to shove it,and we'd rather keep our sovereignty.YOU keep your (our) freaking "federal funds"!!!
11 posted on 08/07/2009 7:19:38 AM PDT by gimme1ibertee (Time to CLEAN HOUSE (AND Senate!!!) Kick their butts to the curb!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gimme1ibertee

If they withhold federal funds then Oklahoma should pass a law saying its citizens can deduct the percentage owed them from their next return (conveniently calculated by the states department of revenue). Withholding funds should not be possible otherwise taxation without representation is being violated. This is why the 16th amendment is a joke, thing kind of thing could not happen prior to it.

Let’s go back to having the state’s remit funds to the Fed instead of the people. Then the Fed has to answer to the states and cannot bully individuals (as our founders intended).


18 posted on 08/07/2009 7:29:14 AM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: gimme1ibertee

No, that’s playing the game according to their rules. Where did it come down on a shaft of light between the clouds that the feds are the only ones who get to participate in rule making? If they withhold $100,000,000 in “Federal Funds”, OK should simply find a way to send $100,000,000 less in income tax withholding.


79 posted on 08/07/2009 8:33:49 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson