Where's the smudge on the fakes?
Posted on 08/07/2009 5:07:46 AM PDT by RobinMasters
A blogger who is maintaining anonymity is claiming to have generated a Kenyan birth certificate for the president that appears similar to the one unveiled days ago by a California attorney who has shepherded several lawsuits over Barack Obama's eligibility.
The blogger wrote on fearlessblogging a list of materials used in the work, including: Fine cotton business paper: $11, Inkjet printer: $35, 1940 Royal Model KMM manual typewriter: $10, 2 Shilling coin: $1, Pilot Varsity fountain pen: $3 and then cited "Punkin' the Birthers: Priceless."
WND e-mails requesting a comment on the posting were not returned.
However, the page linked to the following four photographs:
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Hey, Farah! Where’s the big revelation you were supposed to make this week? Was it that lame threat to the talk show host? Or is there something else? Or nothing at all?
Complicating the situation is Obama’s decision to spend sums estimated in the hundreds of thousands of dollars to avoid releasing a state birth certificate that would put to rest all of the questions.
So if this jackass passed the document off as real, for the purpose of screwing with a Federal court case, there is a PRISON sentence waiting for them.
This is hillarious. What’s even funnier is there will still be people waving this document around 10 years from now claiming it’s zero’s kenyan birth certificate.
If this was all fraud, why did Rahmbo start a national media campaign against “birthers”?
Why not let this go to court and be found to be a fraud, if they knew it was?
Something still stinks.
Perhaps it was that a verified authenticated contemporary Kenyan birth certificate looks nothing at all like the forged Kenyan birth certificate.
No props to the mention of Free Republic in the article?
They called it “Free Republican” though :)
Exactly. Just because he says so doesn’t make it so. They lied themselves blue in the face about the Hawaiian COLB. Why would they do anything else about the Kenyan Birth Certificate?
As far as I’m concerned, it just makes it MORE likely to be genuine.
Our ‘President’ is undocumented.
Ya know what is even funnier than THAT?
How easy it would be for Zerø to prove it is a forgery.
All he has to do is . . .
Where's the smudge on the fakes?
He doesn’t need to prove it’s a forgery.
If that’s the way it worked we could all forge one each and he would be required to spend the rest of his life proving each and every one to be a forgery.
The burden of proof is on the one with the Kenyan Birth Document to prove it’s real. They’re the ones making the claim after all.
Obama has presented the Hawaii COLB. If there were a burden to demonstrate something from his end it would revolve around this document, not every random photoshop and printjob on the internet.
Common sense.
Ghost Dancers.
Crumpling up a paper like this doesn’t remove the folds. Where are they? Obviously another 0bot fake to muddy the waters.
I am Spartacus! No, I am Spartacus!
Following you logic I would tell Texas DMV to prove I am not who I clamed to be on my Drivers License application. Without it they will say I could be someone besides whom I put on the application. But only THEN would they would laugh me out the door.
There is a reason we all have BC’s and are asked to produce them on a regular basis.
Unless of course, you happen to be “The Øne.”
Then you can go with an apparent fairy tale that will not be supported by anyone other than Øbots.
Wait! You mean a COLB image can be faked???
No. Obama hasn’t submitted this Kenyan Document. He has no burden to prove it’s fake.
If I turn up with YOUR birth ceritificate claiming that you are Jesse Jackson’s son, it is not up to YOU to prove that you are not. It is up to ME to prove that my document is legitimate.
I am a birther. Don’t get f-—ing stupid with me. I want obama to produce his birth certificate. But this does not mean that every thing that pops up on the internet claiming to be his birth certificate places a burden upon HIM to prove it’s not.
Any idiot can see that. And no matter how badly I want him out of office I can’t just follow a bunch of lemmings off every cliff that presents itself. You want to go take a flying f-— at every rolling donut that passes you, fine- have at it.
Have a nice day.
“Why not let this go to court and be found to be a fraud, if they knew it was?”
Simple, there is no standard of proof in a public forum, therefore they fight desperately to keep it out of court and present facile arguments to convince the public it is false. That was the Clinton technique and it is now being used by Obama. Let them present their arguments with legal constraints, show how requirement were to be implemented, who was responsible for their implementation, evidence that it was done satisfactorily (going to be kind of difficult in Pennsylvania and those other four states). If they were problems in these areas then the Court and/or Congress should provide a remedy.
The underlying issue of Obama’s eligibility has not properly addressed nor has the presence of an obviously ineligible candidate who appeared on the ballot in five states. I would like to see ONE official responsible for Obama being placed on the ballot explain what their implementing instructions were and how they determined that ALL candidates were eligibility.
I is unfortunate that Orly Taitz and Allen Keyes have to stand basically alone in their struggle to reveal the truth. It seems that most of the people, in positions of authority or influence, are not concerned about the truth or are deathly afraid of what will happen if the truth were known.
If we don’t insist that standards for candidate eligibility are upheld and that election fraud is vigorously opposed other issues will not be wisely determined. There is evidence, immigration, health care and the “bailout” that this is already happening on many issues.
The full scale assault, and superficial arguments, against this document leads credence to it being authentic, or at least being so close to the truth that they were force to go “all hands on deck” to discredit it.
Lavender is soap? Then who is this guy?
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documentsonline/details-result.asp?Edoc_Id=8106122&queryType=1&resultcount=19
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.