Skip to comments.
California Bans Threatening Noose Displays
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/08/06/state/n172326D26.DTL&tsp=1 ^
| August 06, 2009
Posted on 08/06/2009 10:06:34 PM PDT by Steelfish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Safrguns
It would make a fun silk-screened necktie.
To: Safrguns
Sorry, misread your post. I misread your first line as "It didnt say anything about others property."
Nevermind!
22
posted on
08/06/2009 10:53:20 PM PDT
by
SolidWood
(Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
To: SolidWood
>>> The bill by Democratic Assemblywoman Wilma Carter of Rialto would make it a misdemeanor to hang a noose on someone else’s property or at a school or workplace.
Title of the thread says that the display of nooses is now illegal in California.
Certainly I don’t agree that one should have the right to violate another person’s property. Why did they have to make a law about nooses over that??? The law should already be on the books... Tresspass at the very least, and hate speech at best. One shouldn’t have the right to place campaign signs or even a coke can on someone else’s property either... It’s not their property!
Consider what the new law is stating about those who are not even inclined to do such a thing!
It’s like saying “All white people are racists” with the damb law!
23
posted on
08/06/2009 11:00:47 PM PDT
by
Safrguns
To: SolidWood
oops... sorry... didn’t see your post in time.
I’m more ticked off at what the law is saying... not
your misunderstanding of what I was saying.
24
posted on
08/06/2009 11:03:34 PM PDT
by
Safrguns
To: Steelfish
Someone please tell me how you fight racism with racism.
25
posted on
08/06/2009 11:05:04 PM PDT
by
Safrguns
To: Steelfish
I guess the Haunted Mansion Ride at Disneyland will be closed for renovations really soon.
Insanity, it’s the new Coke.
26
posted on
08/06/2009 11:05:48 PM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
(There is nothing wrong with the Government that 552 bullets couldn't cure...)
To: Steelfish
27
posted on
08/06/2009 11:07:25 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Proud member of "The Angry Mob" Est. April 19, 1775)
To: Steelfish
...up to a year in jail... ROTFL!!! Yeah Right! The "judges" over there are turning 'em loose as fast as they can put 'em in. What a bunch of moronic fools.
28
posted on
08/06/2009 11:09:02 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Proud member of "The Angry Mob" Est. April 19, 1775)
To: P-Marlowe
Duly noted. I probably zeroed in too much on the property aspect.
29
posted on
08/06/2009 11:14:56 PM PDT
by
SolidWood
(Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
To: Steelfish
We in California REALLY NEED to go back to a part time legislature. These ignoramii have way too much time. Way too much.
To: Steelfish; All
Okay this is why I despise Schwarzenegger. The fact that he would sign a bill like this reveals something about the man. The fool cannot seem to understand the principal involved in this and how it is a threat to freedom. I've seen a lot of parodies involving a noose in my lifetime. It doesn't necessarily mean violence. Sometimes it is symbolic.
One big question? Where's the damn ACLU when you need them? This should be the type of thing they would oppose.
The legislators who voted for this are aholes. The governor who signed it is also a ahole.
31
posted on
08/07/2009 2:30:06 AM PDT
by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson