Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MamaDearest
Some Codex standards that will take effect on December 31, 2009 and, once initiated, are completely irrevocable include:

Who is writing this ignorant/alarmist nonsense? And why are you spreading it?

"Completely irrevocable"? Says who? In the entirety of recorded human history, there has not been a single law or regulation passed that was "completely irrevocable", because no one has the power to prevent revocation. If it can be imposed, it can be revoked -- and always is, sooner or later.

Do you seriously believe any source that is spouting preposterous statements like "All nutrients (vitamins and minerals) are to be considered toxins/poisons and are to be removed from all food because Codex prohibits the use of nutrients to “prevent, treat or cure any condition or disease”". Have you ever taken and passed even a high school level science course? It is physically impossible to remove all the vitamins and minerals from most foods (only exceptions being highly processed single ingredients like sugar or salt), and no government on the planet would agree to do this even it was possible. What's increasingly common is governments requiring the *addition* of critically important nutrients to foods, such as iodine being added to salt and folic acid being added to cereal products and vitamin D being added to milk.

Reality is your friend. Please consider spending some time with it.

58 posted on 08/07/2009 12:07:24 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker (Vote for a short Freepathon! Donate now if you possibly can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: GovernmentShrinker
If it can be imposed, it can be revoked -- and always is, sooner or later.

I guess that's why Jimmy Carter thought "no harm, no foul" when his visit a few years ago to Cuba with well intended advice to Castro to loosen up a bit, precipitated an amendment to the Cuban constitution providing that the Communist government would always be in power and specifying that the provision could never be repealed.

67 posted on 08/07/2009 1:39:17 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat Party: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Look closer bub, the wording may be clumsy but the upshot is that the list of supplemental vitamins and minerals on the side of your box of King Vitaman is about to get a lot smaller, not because the cereal makers thought that would market better, but because this damned Codex put a lid on it.

The fact that a lousy law could be repealed is no further justification for allowing it in the first place!


68 posted on 08/07/2009 1:43:02 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat Party: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: GovernmentShrinker

From where I sit studying the stuff since 1965 . . .

witness the quotes ref’d in my tagline.

[And unless you attest to having read at least 20 of those quotes spread over the time since 1900 . . . I doubt I’ll think much of your response.]

From where I sit, it’s your reality testing that’s the most flawed.

Wake up and smell the napalm.
Wake up and smell the mass genocide such hideous traitors have planned for decades.

Check out the Georgia Guidestones . . . a very muted and sanitized clue to their goals.

You seem seriously unaware that the globalists are DEADLY SERIOUS ABOUT REDUCING THE GLOBAL POPULATION TO 200 MILLION.

Where have you been—under a rock?

Of course politicians and deadly bureaucrats have pronounced the thousand year Reich and a lot of other ‘irrevocable’ pontifications.

Of course, history proves them wrong.

Are you saying there won’t, therefore, be any trouble from the globalists between now and Armageddon?

And you think THAT perspective is better reality testing?

Guffaws to the max.


94 posted on 08/07/2009 9:56:03 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson