[marron]

The question as to which if either of the two docs are legitimate should be easy.

If one is a fifty year old paper doc, and one is pixels, I’d go with the paper. The pixel doc was probably made from the image of the other.

It doesn’t change the underlying question. It distracts from it, but doesn’t change it.

Where is the original Hawaiian birth certificate. And what citizenship did he claim in college.

They keep throwing out noise and fog and fake documents and fakes of fakes, insults and mockery, all to keep from answering what is really a simple question. Where’s the original, and what citizenship did you claim.

[LibertarianAdam]

If one is a fifty year old paper doc, and one is pixels, I’d go with the paper. The pixel doc was probably made from the image of the other. Sorry. All she claims to have is a jpg emailed to her (read here filing or blog if in doubt). She has no paper doc (in fact, over the last few days she has claimed she was going to Europe to obtain said physical copy). The "punk'd" copy uploaded today is of a much higher resolution that what she has to claim (though all we know is what she uploaded to her blog...she may indeed have an equally high-res copy but no one has seen it yet). Regardless, it looks bad for her case. Her inability to properly file a doc doesn't look much better. I say this having filed quite a few legal documents before.

[SeattleBruce]

It doesn’t change the underlying question. It distracts from it, but doesn’t change it.

Where is the original Hawaiian birth certificate. And what citizenship did he claim in college.
+++++++++++++

Absolutely, yes.