Posted on 08/06/2009 4:32:02 PM PDT by steve-b
If Taitz is incapable of following court procedures or understanding then proofreading is the least of her problems. She has no business being in a courtroom.
I hope for the sake of her patients that her skills as a dentist are better than her skills as an attorney.
That would settle it for me.
Probably because she was in the comfort of her own home when she took those "classes". She's the first, or one of the first lawyers (maybe in the country) that graduated from an on-line law school to be admitted to a state bar. From what I understand (and I didn't know this was possible until last week), California is on of the only states in the country that allows such a thing.
Considering Taitz' performance I'd say that's a good thing for the other 49.
What do you really know about legal litigation in a court room? I know she has been working on this for months.
course, you are a liberal you wouldnt understand, Obama
So isn’t there a competent FR attorney of independent means and mind with the time to take this on? Someone literate and articulate? Bet he wouldn’t have a hard time raising legal fees. ;-)
misleading headline, one for the ping list
Several trolls on this thread, too. Where there's smoke, etc. ...
“Anonymous person has come forward to claim” haha, good journalistic source. Some anon blogger.
Uh, have you seen her hair? It is Skank City. How is that "bigotry"? Against hairdressers?
I think Nathan Hale would have recognized the Shilling impression.
These BC threads are serious troll bait :)
Well, gee. thanks.
Thanks for the ping, LucyT...My money remains on Orly...something just feels right and trolls and/or those who wish to be as aggressive be damned.
Yeah, send it to the court for authentication.
Buh bye.
That’s a good strategy that I had not considered.
Memo to Salon's Koppelman: "The Australian birth certificate on which it was apparently based" might have been forged from the template of Taitz' document, rather than the other way around. We have heard that Mr. Bamford (to whom the alleged "Australian birth certificate" purportedly belongs) has a checkered past, including being charged with fraud in a current criminal case in Australia. Furthermore, neither the Taitz document nor the Bamford document are purported to be "birth certificates," but rather are titled "Certified Copy of Birth Registration." Seems that you are gloating a bit prematurely.
Only an "after-birther" can come up with such a stupid statement, ROTLMAO!!!
They have one complete thread earlier....They don’t even know who is who on FR.....They have us surrounded, looks like we’re winning.
Had a freeper frmail me with a quote....I knew who wrote it before I clicked on the link....The same person who plays a lawyer on FR and has told three different numbers for the years of experience....can’t even keep the lies straight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.