One issue I could really use some help with is posted here. If I could get a statement from Hawaii on that issue, I could then get a correction from the NYT and CNN. And, that would both strike back at the anti-birthers and would help improve coverage of other topics. Please spend a few minutes helping me with that.
The most glaring mistake in the “punked” copy is that the word “Maiden” (just under the stain) looks to be misspelled as “Maieen.”
Zoom in and look: http://www.upload.mn/view/2vu1mtqgb7obp3yym18l.jpg
I am not talking about medical records.
I'm talking about nothing more than the Honolulu Advertiser has already published and is now distributed around the world.
Rather than state vital records (which would have come from the hospitals) the source would be the hospital itself, to wit, Kauikeolani Children's Hospital, I believe is BHO's (latest). birth place.
The point about the newspaper announcement is to argue that the lists of births directly from the hospitals -- with or without BHO -- are NOT medical records. Are all births medical treatments? Why don't the hospitals repeat this little bit of history and augment the Honolulu Advertiser announcement with the addition of their hospital's name.
(Ans: they won't because it would prove BHO a liar IMO.)
Still proves nothing, except that it’s easy to forge a copy of anything you want. I refuse the believe in the validity of any document posted in a digital form on the internet.
Until a paper form that can be verified is submitted to a controlling legal authority this issue is unsettled.
If this is true then it is obvious that the Far Left are trying to pull a ‘Borat’ on Conservatives.
So what has this taught us? That FReepers care about the U.S. Constitution, and that a liberal forger does not. FReepers were not PUNK'D, just diligent.
Now, back to concentrating on the long form.
Punkin the World: Priceless
Hey, I’m sorry to sound so typical, but I haven’t read the thread, just glanced at the pictures. To me this looks like a fake debunking. The cert pictured in the second picture at WND doesn’t look like the Orly cert. For one thing, the stain or burn is quite different.
From the first Orly Taitz asked the court and others to help her establish if the document was real or not. How’s that translate in to getting punked?
Schmutz font, my ass.
The SIN is that OBOZO is allowed to make a Mockery of OUR AMERICAN CONSTITUTION AND AMERICA! as he hides his Legal Birth Certificate while presenting a Forgery and/or a Worthless State Document and traveling the World Apologizing for Manufactured Lies about OUR AMERICA! and Obviously Not OBOZO’S AMERICA!
The fact is, the nitwit forger has actually helped the cause of those who demand proof that 0bama is Constitutionally eligible to serve as POTUS, i.e., the increasing number of questionable certificates floating around purportedly representing the birth details of Barack Hussein 0bama means that only by releasing the ORIGINAL VAULT COPY that is being held by the State of Hawaii can we know for sure whether or not the person occupying the Oval Office actually has a right to be there.
So to the forger?
*THANKS* pal, you’ve raised the stakes and increased the pressure on The Kenyan Usurper to either prove his bonafides or follow the advice in my tagline.
There is one MAJOR problem with this alleged forgery.
There is something over the word “Maiden” in the Mother section of the form the first image. There is also a stain on the paper above the word. On the second image, the “something” isn’t there, but the stain is. Now that’s no big deal, but the revealed word under the “something” isn’t “Maiden”. It’s “Maieen”. Either the forger added this “something” to the document because of his typo, or he photoshopped it out of the document, and didn’t think about copying in the correct letter, or removing the stain. The right serif of the foot of the letter “i” is also missing.
This is just someone who owned the same rug or quilt and figured he could claim responsibility for the document.
Why did the libtards suddenly, all in unison, drop their total disregard for the BC issue, and start pushing the ‘birthers are idiots’ argument IN PUBLIC - everywhere - all at the same time? What scared them out of their holes? What was so important that they did a strategy 180?
Just asking.
First he would have someone say he forged it?
So, if I create a forged long-form birth certificate for Obama and it is proven false, does that mean that Obama is definitely not a natural-born citizen? No..
And this forgery proves no more than that one would.
All I can say is that Obama is clearly hiding something in his past. I have no idea what it is. But we should find out.
So Obama’s pals admit to forging documents. What does that say about their character?
I wonder when they’ll admit to forging the National Guard memos.
This is ridiculous.
The cloth is different, and the ‘document’ is different. How stupid do they think we are?
Yep, the bedspreads are different and the document’s paper is different in the forged photos. I’m not holding out a lot of hope for this one, but still...let’s hope that what Orly has submitted is not a fake.
Think this will be my last post on the BC thing for a while. I’m in “wait and see” mode now.
The President blew up the WTC.