From: "Davis, Lanny J."
To readers of Michelle Malkin's blog who responded to my post on Politico earlier in the morning:
I received a number of thoughtful emails and wanted to express my appreciation to those who communicated their sincere concerns. There was a misimpression that I was in favor of suppression or discouragement of dissent concerning Democratic positions on national health care issues at congressional town hall meetings. This was not my intent. I do not wish in any way investigate, photo, or suppress the opinions of people who show up to these meetings regarding concerns about Democratic health care proposals. Indeed, I welcome that because we need more debate on this important issue.
My post specifically criticized only those who shout down and prevent others from speaking. Indeed, I specifically expressed my respect in that post for those who are genuinely concerned about the health care proposals.
Finally, some sincere people who communicated with me asked whether I had or would condemn those on the left who disrupted meetings or shouted down speakers on the conservative side of the spectrum. The answer is: Yes I would and I have. Publicly.
I believe that thoughtful and civil people on the left and the right share a desire for debate and have respect for other people's opinions. This is fundamental to a civil society and our great democracy. In my post, I only wished to protest strongly those who believe it is acceptable to attend a meeting for the purpose of disrupting and preventing honest and vigorous debate.
I take the same position if it is people on the left side of the spectrum who use such tactics as those on the right side.
Sincerely,
Lanny Davis
I suppose the thousands of messages he's receiving have irked him no end. GOOD!
Regards . . . Penny
Who does he think he is kidding here? The left patented this tactic...
Typical lefty response: Projection, obfuscation, and denial.
Lanny is a master.