Posted on 08/05/2009 10:18:49 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A gap between the possible loss of F-16s and the arrival newer planes to be serviced could jeopardize jobs and future missions at Hill Air Force Base, according to U.S. Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah.
“It’s a little bit fluid as to the impact on Hill AFB,” he said, speaking to the Clipper and other media from across the state Friday morning.
“One concern is the phase-out of the F-16s that have been flying there” and maintained there, the Republican senator said. “They (F-16s) won’t be completely gone, but then comes the impact – what are they going to be replaced with?
“We’re still hoping to get the F-35. That’s easy to say, that we’ll get the F-35s, so no harm, no fault. But the question is in the timing” of the replacements, he emphasized.
“If the F-16s are phased out very quickly, and the F-35s are delayed a long time, then a gap opens up,” Bennett said.
“There will be no work at Hill (related to that), so the workforce gets reduced. Then when the F-35s show up, maybe the Air Force will say Hill doesn’t have the capability to do this, and the workload could end up somewhere else,” he said.
The gap between the closure on the F-16 and arrival of the F-35 needs to be made “as small as possible,” Bennett said, “so we can keep the workforce in place – so that there is no question that Hill is the logical place to put the F-35.”
Bennett has been joined by the rest of Utah’s Congressional delegation in expressing concerns about the impact of reductions in F-16s, the arrival of F-35s, and the existing F-22 aircraft.
A proposed draw-down of 250 “Legacy” aircraft, including the F-16s, F-15s, and others across the country, starting with federal Fiscal Year 2010 in October, has raised the biggest concern for Utah’s federal delegation.
Any such losses could seriously weaken the aircraft arsenal for the 419th and 388th Fighter Wings at Hill AFB, and might mean the reduction of squadrons from three to two, officials have said.
Such aircraft losses could mean 500 or more job cuts at the base, as well, officials have warned.
Concerns for such proposed cuts have also been on the radar screens of local officials, who realize the tremendous impact the base has on the area’s economy and well-being.
Steve Petersen, Rep. Rob Bishop’s defense issues expert, raised concerns even beyond the present in a previous Clipper interview from Washington, D.C.
“What’s going to happen 10-15 years from now” if cuts or delays in aircraft production are approved? he asked.
Not only could that hurt Hill Air Force Base and other federal installations and defense contract workloads, but it could also give an edge to other countries, such as China and Russia, Petersen said.
“It’s actually very disturbing that (Secretary of Defense Robert) Gates paints such a rosy picture, that he’s willing to defer our fighters and our technology,” Petersen emphasized.
tbusselberg@davisclipper.com
F-16 Ping.
Hill will survive. Its a great location for a base with the
Salt Lake Desert range so close, many skilled workers in the Ogden area, the pro-military patriotic citizenry, the
good weather and clear skies. Plus, 3 Walmart Superstores
and 3 Targets within 5 miles of the base.
I agree with all that...........except......the Pelosi, Reid, Obama factor.
Might as well tuck this in here......the Thunderbirds @ Hill AFB 2009!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BX2lVV3NjIQ
Thanks Sparky.
A welcome addition.
Pinging for later.
I recall sending a heat exchanger to Hill once. We just used water in AZ. They needed the more resistant “Glycol”. It didn’t work out.
Dude, hate to break the bad news but Hill AFB is going from 3 squadrons to 2. Yes Hill will survive but it doesn’t help to lose 33% of the base aircraft though. I thought they already announced that, hope it changes, but Luke AFB has already lost three squadrons and you’re unfortunately in the same boat. It is supposedly a done deal on the Hill AFB squadron retirement though. Hope and Change anyone????
Yankeebulldog, Hill AFB is also a depot for a lot of other stuff beyond just the 388th, I’m thinking the cuts they are talking about are for those services.
I was stationed there in the early 80s when they had over 20,000 civilians working there plus the 388th - I’m sure things have changed since then.
Tomorrow is my last here in UT so any weeping I do for Hill will be with it in my rear view mirror. Cuts are liable to be drastic across the board. Only growth sectors I see are
in drones and various spooky intelligence tools.
Weeping in Ft Worth and Atlanta and other places where big dollar hardware is built starts now.
Yes, I certainly appreciate the depot level mission there. Ironically, its an AMC base! Or at least it was as of a few years ago; ACC has to pay rent to AMC! LOL. I think the 388th is the reserve wing, could be wrong. They lost their jets about a year ago. The active duty is supposed to cut one of their 3 units. Its not good on any level.
Best of luck! Ft Worth is great; I’ve been there quite a bit. I love Hill AFB though, and I wish they’d knock off slashing the military while spending $700B on social programs (ie; porkulus). The military is by no means an efficient means of job production, but you get something out of it (security) and you do generate a good amount of low, med, and hi level paying jobs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.