Only in TP land is calling someone a monkey-boy not considered poo-slinging.
I've already explained to you that pointing out the poo flinging isn't poo flinging...
and Bucky is obviously behaving like a juvenile...i.e. a boy and he's a self-professed great ape, so should I have called him poo-flinging ape-boy? orangutan-boy? chimp-boy?
It's so hard to keep up with you evo-libs like Chrissy Fit Matthews and how you demand everyone be defined: "humans are nothing more than great apes"...it's like nailing jello to a wall.
I find it interesting that you liberals demand evolution be rammed down throats...well everyone's but your own, I see. And when you're held to your very own beliefs...being nothing more than a fancy great ape...you whine and cry...you know....like a little ape-boy, when you get called exactly what you damn-well DEMAND to be understood to be!
So buck-up already! If you don't want to be called a great ape, then quit demanding to be called one already! In other words, being a Darwinist has consequences Sherlock!
Now that you've had this explained to you more than once, it would not therefore be poo flinging to rightly point out that you're a dullard and slow learner, as this is now (and has been) simply point in fact.
And if you persist, I think the majority of folks will rightly realize you're a whiney, poo-flinging, monkey/ape/chimp/orangutan/take your pick of any great apes-boy, mo-ron.
Wow. And I just congratulated you on allowing as Catholics were Christians. But you last post makes me wonder if you are a Christian!