Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What If Obama Really Was Born in Kenya?
Slate ^ | August 3, 2009 | Brian Palmer

Posted on 08/04/2009 3:21:40 AM PDT by Zakeet

Despite a congressional resolution affirming President Obama's U.S. birth and a reaffirmation of his birth certificate's authenticity from Hawaiian officials, media outlets continue to air frivolous allegations that the president was born in Kenya, rendering him ineligible for the presidency. Let's pretend, for just a moment, that the birthers had credible evidence that Obama was foreign-born. Then what would happen?

Resignation, impeachment, or nothing. If Obama stood his ground, and Congress stood by him, then the only way to legally remove him from office would be for someone to sue. Problem is, no one would have standing to bring such a lawsuit. To establish standing, a plaintiff must show that he has suffered an injury personal to him, that the defendant caused the injury, and that the court could provide a remedy. That turns out to be an impossible task.

Average citizens could not show a personalized injury because Obama's allegedly illegitimate presidency would impact everyone in roughly the same way. Courts invariably dismiss such claims, like the 1937 case alleging that Justice Hugo Black was ineligible to serve because as a member of Congress he had voted to increase the justices' salaries. Even membership in much smaller aggrieved groups generally doesn't work. The Supreme Court rejected a suit brought by parents of African-American children challenging the IRS's lax enforcement of anti-discrimination laws and another by legislators who claimed their voting rights were diluted by the line-item veto. In both cases, the communal nature of the injury precluded standing. Thus the lawsuit of Army Maj. Stefan Cook, who argued that his pending deployment to Afghanistan by an illegitimate president constituted a particularized injury, was doomed to failure. (The case was mooted when the Pentagon canceled his deployment.)

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; kenya; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-263 next last
To: cripplecreek
Urban renewal.

Can't afford a place in the country. Looks like I'm going to have to start visiting relatives to see who has the most comfortable couch.

201 posted on 08/04/2009 6:58:28 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: All

If ANYONE thinks obama and the Dems could politically survive the discovery that he isn’t an American citizen and is in-elligible to be President, they have lost their minds...


202 posted on 08/04/2009 6:58:38 AM PDT by Maverick68 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
He would still be “President” for purposes of impeachment as he is the officer sworn into that position for which he would be deemed unqualified.

Just as if you hired a CEO who lied on his resume, and your Stockholders had a procedure for removing the CEO, the same procedure would be used to remove an unqualified CEO as a qualified but incompetent or criminal one.

“In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President” U.S. Constitution from Article II

And say Hello to President “brain damage” Biden.

203 posted on 08/04/2009 6:59:57 AM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Adder
"Get that thing out of my house!"


204 posted on 08/04/2009 7:00:12 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Well, if the Constitution doesn't apply to the Ruling Class in DC, why should it apply to us?

ANARCHY would ensue, and so be it. Politicians would have no one but themselves to blame. It would be up to domestic Patriots to retake the Republic amid the chaos.

205 posted on 08/04/2009 7:02:36 AM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
The SS are sworn to protect the POTUS...

Are they sworn to not resign?

206 posted on 08/04/2009 7:02:55 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

Good point

But what are they going to do when they are in the WH with Obama and the US military knock on the door ???

Leave enmass ???


207 posted on 08/04/2009 7:06:46 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
No reliable people ever questioned the fact that McCain was eligible to become President but I guess you and a few small minority of people know better.

I'm not being argumentative, here. I'm relying upon judicial precedent from the very first Supreme Court decision in this country, Chisholm v. Georgia, upon the very first Supreme Court Justice John Jay, upon the 1803 decision that firmly established the system of checks and balances, Marbury v. Madison, and the dicta of the Supreme Court Justice in that decision, John Marshall. Additionally, I'm relying upon the plain words of John Bingham, the author of the 14th Amendment.

There is a very clear reason why no statute law and no Acts of Congress deal with the specific term of art "natural-born citizen." That clear reason is that neither statute law nor Acts of Congress can supercede the supreme law of the land enshrined in the Constitution.

It will take a Constitutional Amendment to accomplish what you mistakenly believe to already be in effect. And, furthermore, from my reading on the matter over the past year and a half, there are even problems with amending the Constitution to this end, again going back to Marbury v. Madison. Going the states route is problematic as well, under the wording of Article V.

So, if you want to argue, argue with someone who hasn't bothered to understand the problem, because the position you're taking relies upon hearsay and faulty interpretation.

Nice screen name, by the way, "Old Devil Dog."

208 posted on 08/04/2009 7:10:44 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Slate seems to think that the fact that there may be no legal recourse is “pretty cool.” This is how you get explosions of civil disobedience.


209 posted on 08/04/2009 7:23:45 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
I'm a bit sceptical on this BC issue, and have my doubts as to weather Obama can be successfully removed from office because of it.

That said though I want Obama and his dimbulb Democrat comrades out of power before they can wreck this country any further, and if this BC issue can get him removed or weakened so much that he's unelectable in 2012 than I'll be more than happy to be wrong and will proudly join the BC movement.

I hope my comments don't get me labeled as a troll because I love my country, and support our military and believe with my whole heart that these two things have been the greatest force for good in the history of mankind. I've been a conservative since I became a born again Christian in 1987 and have been counter protesting a group of anti-war protesters in my town of Redlands since 2006, and have even posted threads called the Redlands FReep here at FR. I still FReep the moonbats, but since I've been doing it by myself for several months now I haven't been posting threads on this.

I like many of my fellow FReepers am disgusted with the raping of our country and the pillaging of our economy by Obama and his socialist thieves in congress, and want to see it end as soon as possible.

I admit I've accused those who believe in the BC issue of being kooks and tin foil hat wearers in previous threads and I was wrong. I still have my disagreements but I believe those of you who think this BC issue is important are great patriots and are doing what is in the best interest of this country and the constitution.

And to good folks like pissant and others, I apologize for derogatory remarks I've made and will even abstain from using the term "birther" as it is a derogatory term used by the left to smear my fellow conservatives.

Obama is my enemy not my fellow FReepers.

210 posted on 08/04/2009 7:28:35 AM PDT by Victory Rocks (Sarah Palin, 2012! YOU BETCHA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Nice screen name, by the way, "Old Devil Dog."

Thanks. One thing that you left out was the Naturalization Act of 1790 passed by the first Congress. This act said: "the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens".


211 posted on 08/04/2009 7:43:41 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; BP2; MeekOneGOP; ...
What If Obama Really Was Born in Kenya?

The first thing about this article that strikes me is that it was even written. It’s a serious piece, (even though written from the lib view) asking questions about the law, who has/hasn’t standing in the courts and what the remedies might be.

212 posted on 08/04/2009 7:45:29 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

You are correct. The courts have not ruled on any of those issues I believe. However, we were discussing the specific instance of John McCain. Someone born overseas to American parents and that has consistently been held that these children are indeed born Americans. Starting with the Naturalization Act of 1790.

In McCain’s case, I’m not even sure if this applies. He was born in the Panama Canal zone which at the time of his birth was an American possession. So he was born on American soil even though it is not now American soil.


213 posted on 08/04/2009 7:47:53 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Manchurian (Kenyan) Candidate put on his throne by whom?


214 posted on 08/04/2009 7:48:43 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Thanks. One thing that you left out was the Naturalization Act of 1790 passed by the first Congress. This act said: "the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens".

And, you're failing to recognize, that that Act was repealed and replaced, in 1795, using identical language with the exception of the specific Constitutional term of art "natural-born citizen(s)." This term was removed, and replaced with simply "citizens."

Why, do you suppose, was this done? It was a recognition of Congressional overreach, perhaps the very first example of such a thing. Congress exceeded powers enumerated to it by the Constitution, and corrected itself.

215 posted on 08/04/2009 7:56:37 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

The act was not repealed for that specific reason. They updated it. They got a lot of things wrong in the first one, for instance things like slaves not being citizens which took the 14th amendment to correct. They never used the term natural born citizen again ever. So if you want to go by that, then no one is a natural born citizen and therefore no one can serve as President.

What it does show though is the thinking of our founding fathers (Madison, the writer of the constitution was in that Congress) concerning what a natural born citizen was. And that thinking concerning a child born overseas to two parents has not changed. They took the term natural born out of the law for all types of citizens.


216 posted on 08/04/2009 8:06:06 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I am unaware of a Congressional Resolution regarding Barry's US birth. There was one for Sarah Palin’s dad.

PS I know you are referring to the article.

217 posted on 08/04/2009 8:07:34 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra; LibLieSlayer

thanks


218 posted on 08/04/2009 8:09:43 AM PDT by petercooper (GOP: Big Tent Party??? Not if you are a CONSERVATIVE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

What if he was born in Kenya and lied about it to get elected? What then?


219 posted on 08/04/2009 8:17:45 AM PDT by Mr. Peabody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet; All

One thing for sure; the communists are starting to “discuss” a solution to the inevitable discovery of 0ghosta’s lies and deception.

This is a very good sign; the path-forward is being explored and debunked in advance!

Here is what I posted early this morning to negate the Left’s and the MSM’s talking points in narrowing the discussion to BC/kooks talking points:

“Speaking for myself, the BC is part of the general question. Where is zero’s paper trail? Why is it sealed? The idiots elected a ghost not a brilliant, handsome, teleprompted Messiah.

I want to see his records: medical, school grades/student loans/nationalities/names, selective service, multiple social security numbers and who paid for his clairvoyant life.

I bet that the BC is just the finger in the dam even if there are no surprises in it; he wouldn’t want the rest of his records seen. He must have lied numerous times about his name(s), nationality (a foreign student), SS numbers, etc.

The Brilliant One must have graduated with a negative GPA and passed along under the racist affirmative action boondoggle!

Regards,
A ghoster NOT a birther”


220 posted on 08/04/2009 8:18:58 AM PDT by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-263 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson