[FTJM]

What I'm saying is, you didn't see what you said you saw. All you saw was a site going offline because of excessive bandwidth utilization. No big deal. Happens all the time when an obscure site with a cheap hosting deal suddenly becomes popular for some reason. The "biased site" thing, the only thing interesting here, is a total red herring.

Unless you can show bomford.net was hacked, you have nothing but a commonplace observation.

Like I said, the site was modified by someone before it was shut down. You claim that the ISP managers made the modification, which makes no sense. You didn't read the thread or understand my comments. However, I said it was STRANGE, drew no further conclusion and asked a question. At this point, your blindingly obvious opinion means very little.

[cynwoody]

Like I said, the site was modified by someone before it was shut down. You claim that the ISP managers made the modification, which makes no sense.

I never said the ISP managers did anything but let their software work. When enough Freepers had downloaded that BC, the software said, "Tilt! Bandwidth Exceeeded!".

The next move is up to the domain owners, assuming they're remotely aware their family site is offline, much less why.

As for "biased" sites and all that, the burden of proof is on you. And having a site shut down by automatic software action doesn't help. You'll have to convince them (the Bomfords and their ISP) to assist in making your history-making case! If it's really true, their logs will be full of evidence.