I never said the ISP managers did anything but let their software work. When enough Freepers had downloaded that BC, the software said, "Tilt! Bandwidth Exceeeded!".
The next move is up to the domain owners, assuming they're remotely aware their family site is offline, much less why.
As for "biased" sites and all that, the burden of proof is on you. And having a site shut down by automatic software action doesn't help. You'll have to convince them (the Bomfords and their ISP) to assist in making your history-making case! If it's really true, their logs will be full of evidence.
The next move is up to the domain owners, assuming they're remotely aware their family site is offline, much less why.
As for "biased" sites and all that, the burden of proof is on you. And having a site shut down by automatic software action doesn't help. You'll have to convince them (the Bomfords and their ISP) to assist in making your history-making case! If it's really true, their logs will be full of evidence.
For clarity, you implied that the ISP managers made the modifications then clarified yourself, then you said that the ISP managers would not have contacted the domain (site) owners but now you say the domain owners might have known, even though they allegedly haven't changed the site in 2+ years. Wow. The site was modified before it was shut down. You have no idea who did it and keep changing your story.
There is no burden of proof on me regarding the Wash Ind site. I provided the link, yet you wouldn't even look at the entire site. You're batting a thousand buddy.