Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Pilot disoriented before crash
Valley Press on ^ | Saturday, August 1, 2009. | ALLISON GATLIN

Posted on 08/03/2009 8:23:02 PM PDT by BenLurkin

EDWARDS AFB - A veteran Lockheed Martin test pilot died in an F-22A crash after nearly losing consciousness during a high-speed, high-g test maneuver, according to an Air Force accident investigation report released Friday.

The $140 million jet, assigned to Edward Air Force Base's 412th Flight Test Wing, crashed during a mission to test the effects of carrying weapons on the aircraft's performance. These tests involved a series of high-speed, high-performance maneuvers in which the pilot experienced several times the force of gravity.

The accident investigation concluded that Cooley experienced such disorientation brought on by the high g-forces, and recovered too late - a matter of seconds - to safely right the aircraft as it was headed down in an almost vertical dive, the report said.

The crash occurred after Cooley successfully completed the first two of the planned test maneuvers, which required inverting the airplane and flying the lower half of a loop, pulling up and righting the airplane.

On the third test maneuver, however, he failed to recover at the same point and continued in a 83-degree downward dive. According to the report, a "weak roll to wings level was started at (about 16,300 feet) but at this point, with the extreme nose down attitude, the roll was simply a pirouette around the vertical axis with little effect on arresting the descent rate."

By the time the aircraft was about 5,000 feet above the ground, Cooley had the wings level, but it was still heading down roughly at a 50 degree-angle.

Cooley ejected at approximately 3,900 feet above the ground and at Mach 1.3, or 880 mph, according to the report. This was about 170 mph above the maximum speed design limits for the ejection seat.

(Excerpt) Read more at avpress.com ...


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: aerospace; aerospacevalley; allisongatlin; antelopevalley; davidcooley; edwardsafb; f22; lockheedmartin; planecrash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 08/03/2009 8:23:03 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The streets of Edwards AFB are named for deceased test pilots. There are a lot of streets there.


2 posted on 08/03/2009 8:31:59 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Start of maneuver to crash, less than 17 seconds, yet he still had the presence and fortitude to bring her around level...only to be killed by the blast of supersonic air on ejection.

Men like this have always amazed me.


3 posted on 08/03/2009 8:33:42 PM PDT by papasmurf (RnVjayB5b3UsIDBiYW1hLCB5b3UgcGllY2Ugb2Ygc2hpdCBjb3dhcmQh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

Prayers for his family! Always hate hearing we have lost another one. God speed.


4 posted on 08/03/2009 8:36:11 PM PDT by stickandrudder (Another Bitter-Clinger --------------- Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

There’s old pilots and bold pilots............


5 posted on 08/03/2009 8:37:31 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays
These guys are some seriously talented airmen.
If Cooley was able to scrub-off just another 200 mph (with just a few more seconds) he probably would be sharing this flight report first-person. I'm awed.


6 posted on 08/03/2009 8:41:32 PM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: BenLurkin

Pray for the family of test pilot Cooley as brave men die that our country may remain secure.

The F-22 and other modern fighters can do flying maneuvers that over stress the human body. The fighters of the future may be unmanned, artificial intelligence flown fighters that make instant decisions as to target or evasion and have minimal command supervision from the home base. Machines at war and Omama cutting defense budgets now may put the USA in second place sometime in the future.


8 posted on 08/03/2009 8:55:04 PM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paddles

ping


9 posted on 08/03/2009 9:00:38 PM PDT by RDTF ("I'm pretty sure this is a 2 man job once the shooting starts")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“experienced such disorientation brought on by the high g-forces,”

How do the creators explain accelerating to Warp Speed in a few seconds on Star Wars?


10 posted on 08/03/2009 9:03:04 PM PDT by Rennes Templar (Jim Thompson for POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT
My question is this I have flown in aircraft for over 14 years as a crew member and have had several rides in Supersonic aircraft an retired from the USAF.
All that being said here are my questions to the article

1. Where the hell was the Pilots G Suit Mandatory wear in supersonic aircraft?

2. How dare the manufacturer's install a rocket ejection seat not capable of speeds of the F22. That is a criminal offense.
3. I want the engineers name who made the decision to okay this ejection seat be installed in a 2 hundred million dollar aircraft. I want his ass on a pike pole.

3. Who is the idiot in aircraft acquisition who allowed this stupid installation to occur this had to get by at least 8 different engineers from the USAF and how many from Lockheed?????

This is a sin somebody needs to go to Jail??

11 posted on 08/03/2009 9:23:38 PM PDT by straps (Its time for people to take responsibilty for there mistakes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Something that I've wondered for a long time is why ejection "capsules" rather than seats aren't used in supersonic jets? It seems that it would protect a pilot from the wind-blast in this sort of situation. Is it because of weight? IIRC, doesn't the F-111 use an ejection capsule, taking both members of the aircrew out at once? It's not required for a side by side cockpit.

Mark

12 posted on 08/03/2009 9:28:44 PM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: straps
Here are some answers to your questions

1. A g-suit only buys you an extra G of tolerence. The pilot has to do the rest himself.

2. The seat probably performed like it was supposed to, but you can't build a seat wear a pilot in normal flight clothing will survive a supersonic ejection. Anything over 450 and you are looking at some severe injuries, even if you survive.

3. I'm sure the seat is the best seat money can buy.

It's a tough business flying an aircraft capable of the speeds and sustained g of the F-22. This will not be the last GLOC mishap in this aircraft. The guys that fly this thing need to stay in the gym and do a lot of squats.

That's my opinion, and I'm in my 17th year flying fighters.

13 posted on 08/03/2009 9:49:41 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: straps
One would think that with "over 14 years as a crew member and have(sic) had several rides in Supersonic aircraft" you wouldn't be asking questions like a neophyte.

Quit emoting.

14 posted on 08/03/2009 9:55:24 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

Wasn’t the cause of the crash an AGL/MSL screwup? Any test point flown over Edwards needs to have 2500 feet added to recovery altitudes due to terrain. My guess (WAG) is if they had flown the point over the water (Vandenburg), that 2500 foot difference would have saved the pilot, aircraft, and the test point.

The Russians have a seat (K-36) that deploys a little pole in front of the pilot. The pole gives the shock wave something to stick to, and the pilot’s body is in a protected stagnation region behind the pole. Obviously, when the subcontracts for the F-22 were let, the Russians would not have been allowed to compete.


15 posted on 08/03/2009 10:21:40 PM PDT by blackpacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

“How do the creators explain accelerating to Warp Speed in a few seconds on Star Wars?”

Trek. Star Trek. Warp Speed is Star Trek.

Sorry, couldn’t help it. :)

And I think it’s artificial gravity and inertial dampers.


16 posted on 08/03/2009 10:38:02 PM PDT by PLMerite (Speak Truth to Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

Navy Bandit nailed it. There remain some things that are beyond our capabilities. Cools suffered from human frailty this time.

But yeah, the Russians do seem ahead of us in super-high speed ejection systems.

TC


17 posted on 08/04/2009 2:19:42 AM PDT by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: straps

The problem is not with the ejection seat. The problem is with the human body. Ejection at supersonic speeds exceeds the design limit of flesh and bone.


18 posted on 08/04/2009 2:24:22 AM PDT by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite; Rennes Templar; Salamander; Slings and Arrows

Theoretically speaking, “Warp Speed” is not actually acceleration, but rather a “fold” in space, created by taking advantage of the non-linear, non-local nature of motion in a “bubble” caused by the interaction of a matter/anti-matter collision in an environment carefully controlled by the modulating influence of dilithium crystals.

(Now, if you’ll pardon me, my trouser cuffs are a bit smelly. It’s getting rather deep in here.)


19 posted on 08/04/2009 2:41:07 AM PDT by shibumi (" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

Don’t forget the flux capacitor.


20 posted on 08/04/2009 3:18:48 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Crazy is the new sane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson