[Adammon]

Then you're an outright liar. Here, uploaded to Photobucket are two comparisons, the high-rez one on the left, the 'real' one on the right. I've zoomed both to make sizes relatively similar, but yet still show enough detail: I have not made ANY changes to the originals, other than zoom. Comparison 1: 47044 Comparison 2: EF Lavender

[Adammon]

In addition to the comparison, I've also done a proof of concept to see how quickly artifacting makes numbers change: On the left is the original EF Lavender and 47044 doc, as posted at Orly and here earlier. On the right is a simple JPEG-low compressed version of the same document. As you can see, the 0 easily becomes a 6, especially if we WANT to see a 6.

[pissant]

Your mistake was to zoom the ‘real’ one to the point of illegibility. Try again, ace. Use windows picture and fax viewer. Hit the + zoom icon five or six times. It is as clear as the nose on your face.

[Swordmaker]

Then you're an outright liar. Here, uploaded to Photobucket are two comparisons, the high-rez one on the left, the 'real' one on the right. I've zoomed both to make sizes relatively similar, but yet still show enough detail: I have not made ANY changes to the originals, other than zoom. Comparison 1: 47044

No, he's not a liar. He is merely mistaken.

Adammon, I am the one who posted that original copy on FR. I made it. It was made from an 860K PNG capture file converted when uploaded to my image hosting service to an 87K JPEG. The "K" is an artifact of that conversion.