[Swordmaker]

Again, the k version came from the SCRBD site.

No, Calpernia, it did not. It came from ME.

[RegulatorCountry]

Wasting your breath, Swordmaker. There's already a thousand would-be Sherlock Holmeses on the case, and they're absolutely convinced that a lossy JPEG means something, in comparison to a lossless PNG. Differing PNG resolutions for display and for print will really blow a few minds, lol.

The notion that this stuff matters was planted back in June of 2008. Never mind that there is no probative value in a photo of a legal document, then or now.

Look at the upside. You're inadvertantly proving the error that so many got sucked into on the Hawaiian thing. Was it real? Still don't know, after over a year of obsessing over it. Is this? Don't know again, and won't either. Anything definitve will come from the physical, paper document, and that alone.

Ahh, but the JPEG, that's where they have them, whoever they are.