Well, your Es are like ebony elephants, enveloping and enlightening.
Your Ks are kinda khaki. Killing Kommunists.
The so-called “K” document presents one very significant problem. For all those claiming it’s a “K”, they need to explain why it appears to be a lower-case “k”. Does it look like a “k”? Yes, it LOOKS like a “k”. But if it’s a “k”, it’s lower-case, not upper - and improperly cased at that, if it’s someone’s first initial.
This leads me to believe that the “k” document is presenting a lower “k” because it’s a distorted capital “E”.
If you look at it from a distance, it appears to be an “E”. When you zoom in, the distortion is more apparent - kind of like looking at an Impressionest painting.
And if someone’s going to purposely distort with this much subtlety - to what end, I ask? It could easily be that the 47,044 is a legitimate coincidence, and there really is someone named E.F. Lavender. The purported letter “O” in the number could just as easily be a distorted “0” if the letter “E” can come out looking like a “k”.
It seems to me WE’RE the ones spending way too much time trying to de-construct a document that might very well be authentic in its “E.F. Lavender” form. I’ve followed this from top to bottom, and, although I am still mostly convinced that Obama was not born in the United States (why the obfuscation, Mr. President?), this supposedly altered document is a giant red herring.