Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joanie-f
IIRC from another thread, the bill contains language that invokes Article III Section 2.

The court will have no jurisdiction to hear arguments as to the Constitutionality of Obamacare.

Back when each member and branch actually took their oaths to support and defend our Constitution, this check on the court by Congress made sense. Today it is the road to Tyranny.

4 posted on 08/03/2009 3:06:23 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Democrats soil Institutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie

Correction: Make that “took their oaths seriously.”


5 posted on 08/03/2009 3:07:37 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Democrats soil Institutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie
IIRC from another thread, the bill contains language that invokes Article III Section 2. The court will have no jurisdiction to hear arguments as to the Constitutionality of Obamacare.

Absolutely. And a good point that I wish I had thought to make in the essay.

From what I can tell thus far, this bill has been in the works for a very long time, and they are covering all the bases as far as making it impenetrable by those who want to challenge its constitutionality -- while, at the same time, making its provisions so vague as to appear unthreatening yet open to broad interpretation, which they will of course use to their advantage.

It is pure evil.

~ joanie

6 posted on 08/03/2009 3:40:15 AM PDT by joanie-f (If you believe that God is your co-pilot, it might be time to switch seats ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson