i just got an email about this and came here for more news.
i guess i’m disappointed that the document is already being questioned as fake. I thought maybe Dr. Taitz had uncovered something.
the 44-O-47 coincidence is a bit suspicious.
what can we do besides wait for the outcome of the authentication?
Not as suspicious as the number: 102181
Not a whole lot. Who ever has it has to authenticate it. The document is good enough to get it checked out.
the 44-O-47 coincidence is a bit suspicious.
+++++++++++++++++
It’s actually 47044, and will it quit being a coincidence on Tue.? So the shelf life of that ‘coincidence’ ends up being 3 days? What’s most curious is that only Orly Taitz knows (or perhaps a few others) who she got this from and how possibly reputable they may be.
Has anyone done a typewriter font analysis - was that font available in Feb. 1964?