Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
5000
Not in Hawaii.
Congrats,,,,RC
According to the U.S. nationality law, a citizen at birth is a person born in the United States. Parental citizenship doesn’t matter. It only matters if the child is born outside of the United States.
See http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1401.html.
There are just two types of citizens: born in the U.S. and naturalized (14th Amendment).
“Natural born” simply distinguishes between those born in the U.S. and those naturalized.
this is what I said
“Because the lack of a marriage can effect UK and US citizenship. Uk if born in the US and US if born in Kenya”
I can’t help you any further to understand if you can’t comprehend the info on my profile.
Thank you...
The Dems aren’t even capable of constructing coherent legislation let alone a fake of this quality.
Well it’s a new day. Starting fresh. My reasons for thinking it’s real: the folds would be hard to fake and age, the star burn or stain appears to have bled onto the folded paper and that would be hard to fake, although easily doable, and finally the lack of signatures. I don’t know if it’s been discussed but that is a good sign. The original would have signatures, but a hand typed facsimile would not. My biggest reason for thinking it’s a fake: The name Joshua Simon Oduya? I keep thinking theres a pun in that name that I’m missing? Josh you? ... O do ya? Maybe it’s just me though!
Uk if born in the US and US if born in Kenya
___________________________________________
DUH
US if born in the US
Kenyan if born in Kenya because Mom was not old enough to confer US citizenship...
Earlier was a picture posted of an Eric Lavender at a Uganda misestry conference in Kampala, Uganda in November 2004. Here, in Feb. 2004 he is at an event in Feb. 2004 Kings School Trust, Zambia. As expected, Eric is from the UK. Have you heard any updates overnight?
“During the visit to Zambia in February Arthur put in place a board of management to oversee the day to day running of the School. This consists of Arthur and Margaret and Eric Lavender from U.K. plus three Zambian Nationals.”
http://www.lifespringinternational.org/newsupdate_apr_04.htm
Natural born simply distinguishes between those born in the U.S. and those naturalized.
Not neccessarily.
It could be determined that a natural born citizen born overseas to two US citizens is a natural born citizen for the purpose of running for President.
The founding fathers wrote that into a law..then took it out during the French Revolution and when they wanted immigrants not to be able to vote for a particular party.
You are wrong. Read the SCOTUS case on my profile.
I have nothing else to say because you just can’t seem to be able to read the law and understand it.
Awesome work! I tended to think that this BC was real, but knowing that it was issued in the 60 day period of Ann Dunham’s pending divorce makes it even more believable.
Thanks so much!
Please make this a separate post so Freepers don’t miss this important find.
“It could be determined that a natural born citizen born overseas to two US citizens is a natural born citizen for the purpose of running for President.”
LOL...it should be
It could be determined that A child born to two US citizens in a foreign land is a natural born citizen for the purpose of running for President. This is the only time the natural born status kicks into play.
I saw the other four pages yesterday. However, I cannot find the web link now. Got any ideas?
So you are saying that Obama Jr is a bona fide POTUS ???
Clinton Leaves on a Seven-Nation Africa Visit
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2307003/posts
Hmmm.
That is one definition. Not the only definition. A poster on Saturday brought up the Elg case.
There is another definition as per SCOTUS.
I don’t believe they intended that definition to be one used for the presidency. I think it came from mixing terms.
Nevertheless, unintended consequences.
????? Didn’t Phil Berg also file a lawsuit against Obama and his COLB? Why is suing Taitz and Hale. And who is Hale the soldier?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.