Skip to comments.
Is this really it? (re: possible Obama's Kenyan B.C. - Attny Taitz) Click on the link
orlytaitzesq.com ^
| 8/2/2009
| rxsid
Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,101-2,120, 2,121-2,140, 2,141-2,160 ... 12,621-12,640 next last
To: Bikkuri
2,121
posted on
08/02/2009 11:18:56 AM PDT
by
NoGrayZone
(Where's The Birth Certificate)
To: nathanbedford
And believing your explanation here runs counter to my desire to see the unfolding of earthshakingly unprecedented events. But I realize you’re making a lot of sense.
And now that I think about it, an impeachment trial would be far from boring.
2,122
posted on
08/02/2009 11:18:57 AM PDT
by
reasonisfaith
(Liberals have neither the creativity nor the confidence to understand the truth of conservatism)
To: Diggity
In this case I think they give Biden the oath of office and escort Obama out of the White House.
In handcuffs.
To: Royal Wulff
I think you’re messaging the wrong person, I explicit say in my comment that the document was generated 3 years after he was born.
2,124
posted on
08/02/2009 11:19:40 AM PDT
by
Mount Athos
(A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
To: Scanian; DJ MacWoW
The idea has been kicked around in the blogosphere for months.
--Scanian
So, was the idea of his being born in Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya always based on someone claiming to have seen the birth certificate we are looking at now, or was there some other basis for the claim such that the BC under discussion would be supporting evidence for that claim, assuming it is valid?
2,125
posted on
08/02/2009 11:21:02 AM PDT
by
ofwaihhbtn
(Science is not defined as that which supports atheistic materialism)
To: wkg
There are two places for signatures, one for Obama Sr. and one for an official. Both are blank.The document is a 1964 certified copy of the an original 1961 birth certificate. The Deputy Registrar is certifying that the information contained in the copy is same as original, and, I would presume, that required signatures were present in original.
2,126
posted on
08/02/2009 11:21:17 AM PDT
by
wkg
To: 9YearLurker
“would that mean Keyes should be the current Senator from Illinois?”
Please don’t make me dream of things that could never be.
2,127
posted on
08/02/2009 11:21:34 AM PDT
by
reasonisfaith
(Liberals have neither the creativity nor the confidence to understand the truth of conservatism)
To: BykrBayb
He has not yet provided ANY link to back his statement. If one is to make such a broad statement, one would think he/she would provide a link.
2 people (including myself) have asked for a link to his statement, but have yet to receive one.
2,128
posted on
08/02/2009 11:21:55 AM PDT
by
NoGrayZone
(Where's The Birth Certificate)
To: bgill
Yes, but Kenya was a colony, they probably are still using that typewriter
2,129
posted on
08/02/2009 11:22:17 AM PDT
by
1000 silverlings
(Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
To: perchprism
So whats the deal? Hillarys been sitting on the original?
If the hildebeast had been sitting on it, it wouldn't have those creases in it still. LOL
2,130
posted on
08/02/2009 11:22:17 AM PDT
by
papasmurf
(RnVjayB5b3UsIDBiYW1hLCB5b3UgcGllY2Ugb2Ygc2hpdCBjb3dhcmQh)
To: Danae
So does Farah. The Enquirer was viewed as a sleazy rag until it came up with some decent investigative articles. It will be the alternative media which sinks Obama, not anything like the WaPo.
To: Plutarch
This Republic of Kenya title is then a key to authenticity. A forger would need do extensive historical research to determine when Kenyans started producing documents with the Republic of Kenya. If other documents from February of 1964 call it the Republic, then it is likely authentic. But if other contemporaneous documents refer to Kenya still as a colony, or something else, then it is probably fake. Contemporaneous documents would be the best corroboration. But notice that this document is only No. 495, a pretty low number. My guess is that this is because the Registrar already had a shipment of the new "Republic" forms and had started using them in advance of the formal declaration of the Republic of Kenya.
To: null and void
I think the original video was removed. Wonder why.
2,133
posted on
08/02/2009 11:22:47 AM PDT
by
Jedidah
("Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana)
To: wtc911
The document is dated in 1961 and refers to "The Republic of Kenya". The Republic of Kenya did not come into existence until 1964. That is an indisputable fact. Find a way to explain that and I'll listen.The document in question was issued in 1964. It is a COLB, not the original hospital document.
Why is it you selectively have no problem with the bona fides of the FactChuck document dated 2007?
2,134
posted on
08/02/2009 11:22:51 AM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 194 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: Plutarch
This Republic of Kenya title is then a key to authenticity. A forger would need do extensive historical research to determine when Kenyans started producing documents with the Republic of Kenya. If other documents from February of 1964 call it the Republic, then it is likely authentic. But if other contemporaneous documents refer to Kenya still as a colony, or something else, then it is probably fake. exactly and that should be easy enough for us or a forger to verify there also appears to be a form number at the top.
There also appears to be two black marks possibly wide spaced staple holes under 7s 6d. The lack of staple holes on Calif DL in the old days indicated an obvious fraud as they sent the DL's out stapled to another paper..there would either be no marks or black marks but no holes on the fakes..dont try that at home.
2,135
posted on
08/02/2009 11:23:05 AM PDT
by
rolling_stone
(no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
To: null and void
It just occurred to me that if Biden were sworn in as his replacement, then he would turn around and pardon hussain... As Ford did for Nixon.
I still think there are millions of contributors to Zer0's campaign (3/4 Billion $) that would sue for fraud, even if he were pardoned for his crime.
2,136
posted on
08/02/2009 11:23:29 AM PDT
by
Cheerio
(Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: DJ MacWoW
WND isn't always right.This will be news when a court accepts it to authenticate.
You are a frustrating person. You must realize you are only a foil for explaining the place of this item in the fabric of what is the news of the day.
The court will not reject this filing, so it will be accepted when it is delivered. They will not act on it for at least another 45 days or so because of Orly leaving the country until August 27th, and allowing the President to respond to the subpoena that was issued with a 60 day time period back in July.
It may be weeks or months before this comes to court. The world will not bury this Document until it meets your standard of authenticity. Sorry.
To: null and void; LucyT; Kevmo; Fred Nerks
Whoever validates or discredits this document must do so having the authentic document in hand. All it would take is a simple test of the paper to determine if it was circa 1964. If confirmed, everything else would fall in place.
There can not have been a reason to produce a forgery in 1964 for a three year old kid.
2,138
posted on
08/02/2009 11:23:49 AM PDT
by
BIGLOOK
(Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
To: shield
Does anyone know when the divorce records were sealed?
There is no need for them to be sealed. Obama didn’t respond. There was no contentious battle between the two.
It was an uncontested divorce.
So if it is, in fact, sealed....then there is something very interesting that someone is trying to hide.
The date of sealing the case might lead to some insight.
Was Lolo’s divorce sealed????? If not, then why with Sr.
To: ofwaihhbtn
For my part, what I read was rumor. I saw no documents being referenced.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,101-2,120, 2,121-2,140, 2,141-2,160 ... 12,621-12,640 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson