Even in the absence of specific statute, does the public have a right to see his original birth certificate, yes or no?
What do you actually believe?
His birth records can still be accessed via the courts. That's what the upcoming court hearings are about. In absence of documentary proof of eligibility ( due to loopholes in the statutes ), then the public has a right to see his original birth certificate. If he won't provide it himself, then the public should be allowed get it obtained through a court order.
(2) No one has been able to get Obama to show his birth certificate in over one year of trying, through both a whole slew of court cases and also through political persuasion. [true or not true; if not true, then show the birth certificate...]
So far...
(3) States control their own laws for who can be placed on the ballot in that state (true or not true; if not true, the show federal laws that specificy that states cannot do this and the federal laws of who goes on the ballot in each state...]
Even States cannot place candidates on the ballot ( and win electoral votes ) that do not actually meet requirements specified in the Constitution. Even States are obligated to have candidates meet those requirements. So we're right back at square one.
They have a right to see it but they can’t legally compel it... and thus, in order to get the candidate to show his birth certificate, we need to pass a state law that requires the candidate to produce his birth certificate or else he cannot be on the ballot... :-)...