Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djf

Yep!

Read it and responded to him.

The Constitution is the law of the land and no others are necessary to qualify a President.

But if some want to spend their time and effort making a new law that will probably be ignored, then more power to them.

But,I think some that argue for a new law don’t seem to understand that if challenged in court, and it is decided that it is unconstitutional, it could make it harder to verify someones ‘natural born’ status.

The Constitution REQUIRES anyone running for President to PROVE their birth status already.

A new ‘law’ may only add to the confusion, rather than solve the problem.

But hey!

If it works, that would be great too!

:0)


298 posted on 08/01/2009 4:56:11 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]


To: Bigh4u2

The fact that ANYONE has any legitimate and unanswered questions about his eligibility means that he has “failed to qualify”.

As far as I can understand it, that means Joe Biden is now our president.

That’s what it says in black and white!


305 posted on 08/01/2009 5:01:09 PM PDT by djf (The "racism" spiel is a crutch, those who unashamedly lean on it, cripples!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson