[Candor7]

The latter illustrates how Polarik actually went so far as to lie about the nature of the images he created and used in one of his reports.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Polarik has lied about nothing. His conclusions are based on empiracal research using professional skills which are second to none.

Why is it so important that you expose Polarik as a fake. What is your motivation in going to such extreme bouts of logic where plain fact is twisted tio suit your own sordid ends? Certainly it is not the quest for truth, or you would have much in common with Polarik.

You fool no one.

Keep it up and we simply do not care , for you want all to lick the hand of the oppressor. Oh yes, history os full of people of your ilk, and we have seen the results of work like yours.It never forwards the cause of freedom, only of the diminution of liberty.

Save your rosey little platitudes for whatever future witch burning you wish to organize, for you are hardly a patriot of our nation, nor of the republic. You have revealed yourself to be a foil, and a laughing stock.

May your chains rest upon you lightly, but we here have no use for the likes of you.

[danamco]

The libs tactics are shoot the messenger instead of the message. Never fails!!!

[LorenC]

Polarik has lied about nothing.

Sure he has. Here's three examples:

1) He claimed that he had forged a clone of the Kos COLB from someone else's COLB. That was a lie, as he had only doctored up the Kos COLB itself and passed it off as a clone. 2) He claimed a Masters in Statistics and a Masters and a Doctorate in Experimental Psychology. That was a lie, as he does not have those degrees. 3) He claimed that he discovered that TechDude was a fraud, and that he never trusted him. That was a lie, as Polarik consistently defended TechDude for weeks, stating that he and TechDude were planning on working together. In fact, he went so far as to say "I can tell you that I know who is TechDude, and that he is who he says he is."

His conclusions are based on empiracal research using professional skills which are second to none.

He has no professional skills with regard to computers or document analysis. He is not the expert he professed to be, and his work and analysis are that of an amateur, not a professional. His skills are "second to none" only in the sense that they exceed zero.

Why is it so important that you expose Polarik as a fake.

The same reason I'll expose false quotes as bogus. I dislike the spread of misinformation, and Polarik dealt heavily in misinformation.