There is a great deal of reason to believe the electoral college and other government entities and officials failed in its/their responsibility to ensure Obama is legally a natural born citizen if the US. That is a very specific definition.
But let us be realistic. The die-hard liberals don't care if Obama meets that standard. I would say 25 to 33% would think that the right has again managed to get the SCOTUS do do their evil will if the messaiah is removed. And who knows? If he get s the boot it may pave the way for a constitutional change that puts the likes of the Gubinator in the white house. Then all of Obamas policies can continue w/ rino backing.
As for me, I want this IV drip of poison out of America's arm and I am fine with what would be perceived as a loop hole getting it done.
I think Cook may believe he is fulfilling his oath to defend the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. We just need to figure out which kind of enemy Obama is first.
Agree. But has it ever been codified? It for sure doesn't spell it out in the Constitution. I mean we can read papers by the relevent authorities from the time frame when the Constitution was written and ratified but it isn't the same as there being a clear legal precedent to rely on.
Much of my argument rests on this obviously. If it has clearly been demonstrated (to quote myself) in the past, this is a relevent precedent. I don't believe it ever has though. And because of this I don't believe the issue is clear enough where I want soldiers disobeying orders over it. I think both items of discussion are a very serious issue. The legitimacy of the President and the military following the directives given to it. Very serious.
Personally, I would like to see this definition determined and codified into law so that is clear in the future.