Posted on 07/29/2009 3:08:15 PM PDT by dynachrome
. He'd never have made the elementary error of putting the real reasons for banning Savage in a confidential e-mail. He'd know that the final destination of confidential Labor government mail is the front page of the conservative Daily Mail.
Which is where the internal Home Office e-mails relating to Savage's exclusion from Britain ended up this week.
----------------------------------
The answer is that naming and shaming Savage was a low exercise in cheap politics all too characteristic of the Brown government
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
“List” Geez
More on Savge being banned in UK
... and the reason other talk show hosts, ie, Rush, Hannity, etc didn’t come to his aid is the way he, Savage, diss’d them. Calling Rush and Hannity all sorts of names on his show.
A lengthy but good article.
hah. That’s pretty funny. ‘bout like the real emails the dummies in the UK used.
733 words by my computer word counter. I was actually disappointed there wasn’t more meat to this article!
Looks like a perverse quota system to avoid accusations of racial profiling.
Kind of like strip searching granny at the airport.
Are Monk, Ham, Johnny, Renny, and Long Tom banned too?
That’s it alright.
The violent muzzies might get even more violent if the list isn’t “balanced”
patricia, chemistry and habeus corpus to?.....
oops....sorry, meant for post # 10, MrEdd’s.
A government with balls could use that to their advantage...
I see that their listing had a quota attached, of picking at least one of each category of “unacceptable people.” Savage fit the “Jew” box to offset the Muslim terrorists, and demonstrate the “fairness” of the process, so they could meet their quota to “balance” the listing.
After all, it is important to appear to be fair in a mad, mad, mad, mad world.
The article says that it would be fun to see Savage cross-examined by the British elite lawyers. No, the real fun would be to see Savage’s lawyers cross-examine the members of parliament; Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Interior Minister Jacqui Smith and the the bureaucrats. That would be a hoot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.