How hard is this for you to understand. Congress can make a law. The Supreme Court can rule it unconstitutional. OH, AND CONGRESS CAN PASS AN AMENDMENT OVERTURNING SCOTUS.
Yes, Marbury said
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is”
Congress can define Natural Born Citizenship in a law..the Supreme Court can say unconstitutional.
CUT TO THE CHASE. Point out EXACTLY what says Congress will have to hold a Constitutional Convention AS YOU CLAIM THEY MUST...to define Natural Born Citizen.
POINT OUT EXACTLY WHAT SAYS SCOTUS CAN”T DEFINE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
I don’t care about Marbury V Madison or the thousands of scholars who have weighed in agreeing or disagree with Marshall...or whether Judicial review was already there or whether he created it...or wheither Marshall violated the Constitution...or whether the law he struck down was actually constitutionaL.
Jefferson could have wrote an amendment saying that the Supreme Court can’t judge the constitutionality of laws - the 11th amendment overuled a SCOTUS case.
Just give me a SPECIFIC quote with a link that says there will need to be a CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION TO DEFINE NATURAL BORN STATUS.
Not what some scholar thinks or interprets.