Posted on 07/29/2009 4:29:49 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
I’m sure that if Obama is forced to produce his birth certificate and it shows that he was not born in Hawaii, he will be interested in your theory.
A simple DNA test comparing him to his supposed half brother, sister, or what ever should easily tell. Good luck to us on that!
Both ( exposing Obama while continuing to oppose his policies—which is gaining traction) can happen in concert it seems to me.
Don't fall into that liberal trap. You are assuming that we can't walk and chew gum at the same time.
The Birther issue is not subtracting from the total attack on Obama and his policies-it is adding to it. And it is working. Look at the energy that The Left is being required to pour into its anti-birther tirades. That is taking real oxygen out of their tent. People aren't stupid. When Daily Kos starts ranting about something people wonder WHY.
We know who John Galt is. We just want to know who Barak Obama is.
Mommy has some interesting pictures, too.
In what way does hearsay have bearing to the facts.
He was wise enough to see it for what it is...conjecture, speculation, and opinion. If you think you're wise enough to see that it's more than that, then by all means, point out for all of here, where he offers evidence to support his claims.
A “Well, how about that...” ping to self.
Wasn’t Clinton an illegitimate child as well?
What is it with ‘rats and illegit politicians?
Is this where the term ‘rat bastard’ comes from?
OK, Uncle Chip, I'll hold him down and you look under his bed. There's an Indonesian CIGAR BOX THERE WITH THE BIRTH CERTI......OMG!
Chip, there's a hole in the Constitution. There is no mechanism ... no legal process....no way to force the guy to do anything about the Birth Certificate... much less force him to figure out if FMD, The Commie Labor Writer and Pornographer, is the bio-pa. Team Obama is working the legal angles on defense, Team Keyes et al are working their legal angles on offense. The offense is starting on their own goal line. The defense is holding all over the country, forcing turnovers on 1st down. Team Obama has two seemingly insurmountable advantages:
(1) they probably know the absolute truth and
(2) they don't have to prove a damn thing. It's the law.
I thought about that too. But if you watch t.v. way way too too much like I do, (CSI-all flavors, Law & Order, la la la) then you know that one can easily get DNA from an unwilling suspect. (Discarded cig, drink can, hair from wherever, etc.)
That scenario is no far fetched if you asked me. But I tend to believe the Kenya thing because of the Grandma thing, plus the fact that it seems to be common knowledge over there that he was born in Kenya. PLUS, now they’re chargin “admission” to see where this imposter was born in Kenya? Please. I don’t know what the answer is, but boy howdy, you can’t suppress the truth forever, whatever that truth is, Obama is hiding something.
Now that’s funny, I don’t care who you are. Thanks for my first laugh for today.
Not just something, he is hiding everything. No copies of school records, pass ports, travel agendas, etc. All are sealed.
Of interest to me is where he got the money for all his living expenses, travel and schooling. The same was true of Bill Clinton. When he was expelled from Oxford for attempted rape (the unofficial truth) Clinton travelled for months throughout eastern Europe and Russia with no explanation ever offered as to where, why or how.
Both seem to have been groomed for the positions they eventually achieved.
yes, Clinton is also theson of a fictious and conveniently dead father. Now that he’s lost weight, when you look at him in profile, his resemblance to a prominent family is striking. I’m from NY, and I kept being puzzled by how he could look so much like our former governor. Until I read that the governor’s brother was governer of Ark. when Clinton was born.
But also fraudulent of it checks out. All the filing papers to run for office would be invalid legally it seems if obama is shown to be using aliases.
Only if you can prove he knowingly used an alias for fraudulent purposes..Is it his fault if his mom lied to him?
No, the natural born citizen clause in the Constitution is a requirement not a hole. That requirement is in the highest law of the land.
When a clause like this is so blatantly violated right in front of our eyes, it emboldens those that have done it to boldly violate any and all others at their convenience, and those who have let this happen will find themselves ruled by the lawless who will subsequently appoint czars, take over corporations, violate rights of bondholders, control their health, take their property, etc in continual contravention of that highest law of the land.
Proverbs has this to say: "They that forsake the law, praise the lawless" [Pr 28:4]
To those who call the natural born citizen requirement a loophole, I say:
"praise away -- the lawless love their useful idiots".
You are correct, and I did not mean to trivialize the issue. For that I apologize.
However, The "Natural Born Requirement" is an opening for the unscrupulous of this era, whose machinations the Founding Fathers being human, were unable to foresee. The Founders relied upon contemporary ideas of natural law as handed down to us by English law. So, they did not define "Natural Born Citizen," nor indeed did they even feel they had to. Furthermore, and more important to us in the present quandary, they did not specifically designate any any authority over the requirement.
My own particular efforts are directed at making the documentary evidence of eligibility mandatory by state law. It is the electors of the states who can say who is eligible and who is not, and to cast the state's votes in the Electoral College. If a state has a "Proof of Eligibility Law" they can deny a candidate who refuses proof a place on the ballot in that state and thus, the state's electoral votes. Secondarily, any legal disputes could not be ignored by the Federal Courts.
But Obama has no defense against the ultimate weapon—political pressure—once it reaches a certain critical mass.
Although still on the low part of the curve, each day it’s moving closer towards exponential increase.
Paternity fraud doesn’t make ones name invalid, even if you are named “Jr” of a man who is not your biological father.
Around 10% of the population is not born to the person they think is their father. That doesn’t mean that they need new names.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.