Replies

Please explain why this is embarrassing to the conservatives, and in particular anyone who has taken the oath required of military members. You know, that oath that goes:

"I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

If the person filling the role of the president is doing so fraudulently, per the Constitution, are you relieved of your obligation? Why would you want to question something that can be easily, and legally dismissed as opposed to a potential Constitutional crisis?

12 posted on 07/29/2009 3:52:52 AM PDT by plsjr (<>< ... reality always gets the last vote.)

the constitution means nothing to an agenda driven socialist

17 posted on 07/29/2009 4:05:28 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))

Senator McCskell didn't figure on a US soldier explaining the Constitution at her Odumbo Health Care Town Hall meeting...(watch the reaction)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y98HxYbsdBM

24 posted on 07/29/2009 4:15:12 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794