Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Filed for LATE Birth Certificate! (Maybe)
FreeRepublic ^ | Today | Douglaskc

Posted on 07/28/2009 8:55:15 PM PDT by DouglasKC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last
To: DouglasKC
No dice. The COLB clearly indicates his birth certificate was filed 4 days after his birth. And 4 < 365, the last time I checked.
101 posted on 07/29/2009 11:32:31 AM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Okay but apparently there is a microfilm image of his birth announcement in the newspaper. Did momma just have that put in for some reason? That seems odd without an application for a BC at the same time.


102 posted on 07/29/2009 11:42:18 AM PDT by jokyfo (I"M JIM THOMPSON!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Questions:

1. Does anyone know how a late-filed birth certificate is indicated as such on a COLB? That’s important because, remember, nobody has EVER seen the entire back side of Obama’s purported COLB. Does anyone have a COLB based upon a late filed birth certificate?

2. Is it possible that those birth announcements did not come from any microfilm at a library? What is their provenance? The first announcement was sent to Texasdarlin at her blog months ago, e-mailed to her from someone named Lori, who claimed that she wrote to a Hawaiian library, asking for copies. Supposedly, that photo of the newspaper announcement is what she received and forwarded to Texasdarlin. The second announcement showed up much later, but I don’t know its source.

So, does anybody know FOR SURE that these announcements are copies from actual library microfilms of newspaper pages from 1961? Or are they plants?

Could Ms. Nordyke, who supplied the photostatic copies of her twins’ birth certificates, have also saved and supplied to someone copies of the newspaper pages from when the birth of her twins was announced?

Many people do save such newspaper announcements, for posterity.

So could those announcements have been photoshopped, based upon the pages that somebody saved from 1961; but which actually showed the birth of those twins—later to be replaced with the announcement of the birth of “a son” to a “Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama”?


103 posted on 07/29/2009 12:00:23 PM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jokyfo

“Apparently” is the operative word. What’s the provenance for those announcements? Do we know that they are any more legitimate than the COLB? NO, we don’t.

We know that such announcements are generated from the information sent to newspapers from the Dept. of Health in Hawaii.

There’s been speculation that Obama was actually born as much as 6 months earlier than represented. His mother left college after the fall semester, 1960. Why so early, if he wasn’t born until August ‘61?

It’s been said that there are no photos of her pregnant, but that there are photos of her NOT pregnant, taken (if true) in the summer of 1961, when she ought to have been very pregnant.

She attended the fall semester at a college in Washington state in 1961, right after he was supposedly born. There is proof that she was living in Washington state in 1961 under the name Anna Obama. There are contemporaneous accounts by friends that she was there in late August with a baby. One woman stated in an interview that she babysat for him in Washington state while Anna attended college. The woman said that her own child was 18 months at the time, and she was born in July 1959. That would mean that this woman was babysitting for Obama in early 1961, which would be impossible if he wasn’t born until August 1961.

It’s possible that he was born earlier and that someone filed to register his birth in August 1961, presenting some kind of “evidence” to support it, but that may have been nothing more than a statement from his mother, one of his grandparents, or even BHO Sr.

A registration of any type (from the hospital, late from a statement, from a midwife, etc.) would generate a notification to the newspapers of the birth and then an announcement would be printed.

There is evidence that the Obamas never lived at the address listed in those announcements. Indeed, the person who did live there conveniently died only a few weeks prior to those announcements surfacing. That person, coincidentally, was a professor at the same college that the Obamas attended and was friends with many Democratic politicians in Hawaii. There is also evidence that BHO Sr. lived in an apartment at that very time, and Ann did NOT live there with him. It’s questioned whether they EVER lived together as man and wife, as no evidence to that effect exists, but for those questionable birth announcements.

So many questions, so few answers.


104 posted on 07/29/2009 12:19:24 PM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Yeah. Obama’s thugsrus could have contacted Fukino and said Obama is considered natural born according to blah, blah even though the BC was delayed. And they could have even said to say anything else would be wrong. Fukino could feel bound to follow orders.

I think apuzzo needs to see this.


105 posted on 07/29/2009 1:09:18 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: All

I decided to dig out the copies I had to get for my children
to get a drivers and passport. Just in case my memory was bad. I have said this before we were turned away from the DMV with a Obama type of BC. We had to have the long form and they kept the copy so we ordered a few extras. This one was retrieved in 2004 in California.

I am not saying obama’s would be the same but what I am trying to say is a copy should not just be a piece of paper easily copied and the information should be more in depth than Obama’s.

For one thing BC’s back in obama’s day may have been just thick paper. But you would think a copy of todays standards would not be. Unless a copy of the copy was made at kinkos.

The form itself is 8 1/2 by 11. The paper is not normal paper. On the back it has these little slivers of something molded in to make the paper. Like a onion skin paper but slivers of colored foil maybe. The colors are pink, blue in the middle then pink with a deep blue border that reminds me of currency in the way they make it hard to counterfeit. This is a government document whether it is a copy or not.

On all four corners there is a embossment you can feel by touch. Upper two feels like something the government might do for their checks.

The bottom two are state and county seals seals. Fully raised and for me it would be hard to do unless I was a counterfeiter. Or maybe you can get these forms on the black market and fill them out. I don’t know. You would still need the stamp.

The country recorder stamp which is embossed placed to make them genuine is above the left state seal. No color, just a raised seal. They guy printed out the original on this special paper, then stamped it.

At the top of the BC it reads where they got the copy, Birth Book 513.

It reads certificate of live birth.

State birth certificate number.

local registration district and certificate number.

First, Middle, Last Name
sex
This birth single or twins
DOB
Hour
Place of birth, Hospital
street, address of hospital
city or town
county
name of father, state of birth, age
name of mother, state of birth, age
Mothers signature date signed (which was date of birth)

Then physicians signature. I certify that I attended this
birth and the child was born alive at the hour, date and place stated. Then physicians license number and dated.

Then physicians name typed with his address.

local registrar and signature. dated 6 days after birth.

stated certified copy of vital records.


106 posted on 07/29/2009 1:50:14 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

ping


107 posted on 01/24/2010 6:26:57 PM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

I just had the thought that the amnesty issue is ‘personal’ for him. Is he even legal?


108 posted on 01/24/2010 6:53:38 PM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson