Replies

"Evolution can be falsified simply find fossil of a pre-cambrian rabbit, or a Clovis point embedded in a Velociraptor fossil. You cannot disprove “God did it” that is why Intelligent Design/Creationism/ cdesign proponentsists are not science."

Creation can be falsified scientifically in theory, I said it cannot be ruled out because there is no scientific evidence to rule it out. To rule it out is to be philosophical not scientific. To falsify creation using science a scientist must: generate matter from nothing randomly, collide particles together and form an intelligent system, produce new species by breeding an existing species over time in a natural setting. If any of those experiments were true, then it would hurt the theory of Creation and could even eliminated it from science altogether legitimately not by the force of judges in a courtroom.

Why did you quote an Evolutionist saying, “Evolution is a cornerstone of modern biology,”. Of course he thinks that, he's an Evolutionist. Do really think that is any kind of evidence whatsoever? And you call me unscientific?

"So again you are shown to be incorrect, I will however give a little credit for at least attempting to set up a straw man to knock down."

Great, it only took a few posts and you are already saying straw man. You are most certainly an Evolutionist. There is no straw man in my argument, you just used a quote from an Evolutionist to prove that Evolution is the cornerstone of Biology. That is a complete joke.

"And yes your statements do show that you have a very poor understanding of science. This is stuff that one would normally learn at the high school level."

You have disproved nothing I have said. Biology studies the origin of species and Creation is a legitimate theory that can be dis proven with testing. You don't like that idea because you know that all the tests would fail and prove Creation as the proper theory on the origin of all species until scientific evidence can prove otherwise. That is the very definition of science. Cling to your philosophical thinking, but know that it is not the thought process of a true scientist. It is simply a thought of a hopeful philosopher with a head full of dreams and heart full faith in Evolution.

I quoted John H. Marburger III, director of the White House’s Office of Science and Technology during the George W. Bush administration.

You do realize that Judge John Edward Jones III is a lifelong Republican and an active member of the Lutheran church who was appointed by George W Bush, just like John H Marbuger III? So you are saying that George W. Bush is an evolutionist?

You are using your misunderstanding of science to set up straw man arguments too knock down.

Using the Scientific Method you can never prove anything; you can only disprove, or in other words falsify the theory. This is something that is taught in Jr. High Science class.

With each post you are making it more and more obvious that you do not understand Science, or the Scientific Method. Perhaps it would be a good idea to take some time to understand a topic before you attempt to present an argument against it