[Ira_Louvin]

I quoted John H. Marburger III, director of the White House’s Office of Science and Technology during the George W. Bush administration.

You do realize that Judge John Edward Jones III is a lifelong Republican and an active member of the Lutheran church who was appointed by George W Bush, just like John H Marbuger III? So you are saying that George W. Bush is an evolutionist?

You are using your misunderstanding of science to set up straw man arguments too knock down.

Using the Scientific Method you can never prove anything; you can only disprove, or in other words falsify the theory. This is something that is taught in Jr. High Science class.

With each post you are making it more and more obvious that you do not understand Science, or the Scientific Method. Perhaps it would be a good idea to take some time to understand a topic before you attempt to present an argument against it

[Jaime2099]

You do realize that Judge John Edward Jones III is a lifelong Republican and an active member of the Lutheran church who was appointed by George W Bush, just like John H Marbuger III? So you are saying that George W. Bush is an evolutionist?

This debate has nothing to do with Repulicans or Democarates it is about Evolution vs Creation in Biology. I didn't say George Bush was an Evolutionist, I said John H. Marburger III was an Evolutionist. You Evo's never stick to the subject matter and always make accusations about things that have nothing to do with the topic. It is truly remarkable.

"You are using your misunderstanding of science to set up straw man arguments too knock down."

Empty words that mean nothing.

"Using the Scientific Method you can never prove anything; you can only disprove, or in other words falsify the theory. This is something that is taught in Jr. High Science class."

You just stated my case for me! I wrote that science can conduct studies on Creation and they would all show that it is a solid scientific theory because all the studies would be unable to disprove it. These same studies would also disprove (or seriously discredit it) Evolution of the species from one. The reason studies on natural Evolution using current species and partial collision are never conducted is because they will yield horrible results and make Evolutionists look like buffoons.

With each post you are making it more and more obvious that you do not understand Science, or the Scientific Method. Perhaps it would be a good idea to take some time to understand a topic before you attempt to present an argument against it

You cannot mock me with your philosophical rubbish and succeed, only with science. Studies can be done on Creation to disprove it, it is science and a million childish insults from you about my knowledge of the scientific method will never change that.