Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's Catholic Outreach Director Assesses Obama's Catholic Outreach (Calls it dishonest)
US News & World Report ^ | July 23, 2009 | Dan Gilgoff

Posted on 07/28/2009 12:59:57 PM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: trisham
love that last photo of Pope John Paul

That's also been my wallpaper for about four years now in my office. But, believe it or not, I have never (ever) discussed anything having anything to do with faith in the office. Ever.

61 posted on 08/22/2009 11:00:56 AM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; Petronski; trisham
You can lie until the cows come home but that is stalking and you know it. Two posts on two old threads and both of them landing within 60 seconds of each other, you were lined up for that.

Hey Einstein: Did it ever occur to you that some loser/stalker created a "persidiot9" keyword, and I posted this to the moderators when you started your gutless whining about "personal attacks?" This is one of those threads. Anybody here now could have eaisly follwed that keyword. Actions have consequences.

62 posted on 08/22/2009 11:07:22 AM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I believe you. :) It must be so tranquil in your office, with that picture in view.
63 posted on 08/22/2009 11:10:05 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; Petronski
You can lie until the cows come home but that is stalking and you know it.

******************

What would you call visiting thread after thread just to take potshots at another religion? Just being friendly?

64 posted on 08/22/2009 11:14:26 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What is with this nastiness and personal venom that you put out, and didn’t the moderators already admonish you and clear up your false keyword posts, in fact deleting them?


65 posted on 08/22/2009 11:19:07 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: trisham

I don’t do it so I don’t give it a thought.


66 posted on 08/22/2009 11:22:14 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
What is with this nastiness and personal venom that you put out, and didn’t the moderators already admonish you and clear up your false keyword posts, in fact deleting them?

In case no one ever told you this, whining about non-existent "personal attacks" is what cowards do when they are backed into a corner and they have run out offective points to make. It's part of the DNA of a liberal politician.

Can you tell me what it is that I said which you found so objectionable? Or are you bloviating?

67 posted on 08/22/2009 11:43:26 AM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What does this constant personal attack have to do with the subject of this thread, this isn’t the religion forum, this is news activism, I’m sorry that you take the political issue of the American Catholic vote so personally.

As a conservative, the Catholic vote that sustains the democrat party troubles me and I hope that we can do something about it. Have you any suggestions on how we can get Catholics to vote for republican candidates?

Do you even remember what this thread is about, it is about the Catholic vote and the two political parties, one fighting to win the Catholic vote and one fighting to keep it.


68 posted on 08/22/2009 12:10:38 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Rather than continuning to accuse me of "personal attacks" you would be better served simply answering the question that I have posed multiple times. You refuse to do so, though the answer would be plain to a child. Then, unbelievbly, you seek to continue the discussion as if the question had never been asked. You tell me how I should charachterize such behavior. Your anti-Catholic opinions drive your thought process. If your failure to grasp VERY simple concepts is not stupid, then it is delibrately absent-minded. The obvious answer to one question destroys your argument, so you ignore it. Repeatedly. As I've stated before, I could care less what you believe. There are many many people who hate Catholics here on FR. And I've been in my share of arguments here. When I come across someone arguing against the truth, I don't give up. So I'm very familiar with what you're doing here. You know you're wrong (that's why you ignore the question of course). You're backed into a corner. So you do what any weasel does: You play the victim card ("stop making personal attacks"). The Clintons did it ("Vast Right Wing Conspiracy"), Obama does it ("The politics of personal destruction"). Here NY, Dave Patterson is currently engaged in making his bad job about his critic's racism. It's called changing the subject, but you're still just as wrong.

And the subject of this thread is irrelevant. You began this argument with me on another thread and then continued it over here. You have a low opinion of Catholics. I get it. It makes you feel like you've won something personally if you can say that members of your own faith are more Conservative than Catholics.

69 posted on 08/23/2009 5:19:09 PM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
What is with this nastiness and personal venom that you put out, and didn’t the moderators already admonish you and clear up your false keyword posts, in fact deleting them?

You are falling back on the victim card because you have no valid point to make. Answer my question, and it will all be over: Who is qualified to identify who is and who is not a Catholic?

70 posted on 08/23/2009 5:21:12 PM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Who is qualified to identify who is and who is not a Catholic?

******************

Good question. The Vatican?

71 posted on 08/23/2009 5:22:54 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
We aren't in religion we are in news/activism where the question is, who are these Catholic voters that the republicans are trying to woo from their democrat voting. Trying to turn something so straightforward into a Catholic theological purity discussion is asinine.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

72 posted on 08/24/2009 8:04:13 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: trisham

The Vatican has set down specific qualifications for membership to the Catholic Church. These include, but are not limited to complete acceptance of the Catholic tradition on Christ’s life, death and resurrection, acceptance of all Catholic Dogma and Cannon Law, Baptism, Confirmation, weekly Mass attendance, periodic confessions (and as necessary), etc. Several of these overlap, of course (we confess our sins and profess our faith at every Mass).

The point is, of course, that you are not a Catholic just because you were baptized -no matter how much you think you are. And an MSNBC is certainly not qualified to make that distinction. I’m pretty sure you know all of this, so thanks for the opportunity to repeat it.


73 posted on 08/25/2009 6:32:43 PM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

You are right that we are not in a religion forum. I posted this thread, and I did not post it there. You are wrong in thinking that this is a question of theological purity. Catholicism is such that a person either pratices the faith or he is not a Catholic. There are good Catholics, and there are bad Catholics. There are also people who think they are Catholic or claim to be, but are not practicing the religion, so they are not Catholic. Not even a little bit. Its an either or proposition. Just like there are no vegetarians who sometimes eat meat.

Meanwhile, you continue to be a broken record. Refusing to answer one question which puts this stupid (perhaps why it appeals to you?) argument to rest. So your response is to post yet anoter MSNBC poll. Ever stop to think why we have all these polls coming from MSNBC? Or why it matters to some of us here that we refute them every time we see them? As time goes by you look more and more like a pro-Obama troll to me. You act like one anyway.


74 posted on 08/25/2009 6:39:18 PM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

For all of that 54% of Catholics voted for Barack Obama.

By the way that isn’t an MSNBC poll.


75 posted on 08/25/2009 7:41:15 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“There are lies, damned lies, and statistics”-—Mark Twain

Now, I don’t know if polls are a type of “statistic”, but I do believe that the premise offered here that the “Catholic” vote offered in poll results are not accurate for the very reason that others here have given—that there are practicing Catholics and then there are those who call themselves Catholic when actually they are not.

For that reason, I don’t believe the poll results are factually accurate.


76 posted on 08/25/2009 8:12:29 PM PDT by Running On Empty ((The three sorriest words:"It's too late"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Running On Empty

Ignore what you wish when it comes to political knowledge.

The rest of the political world wants to know how the different demographics vote and at some point Republicans are going to have to look into why they do well with Protestant Hispanics and do terribly with Catholic Hispanics for instance.

Some bolder (conservative) Catholics must be interested in the Catholic voters and studying their historical voting pattern for democrats.


77 posted on 08/25/2009 8:27:34 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
For all of that 54% of Catholics voted for Barack Obama.

At this point I am just going to call that statement a lie as you continue to ignore the question that makes it so.

By the way that isn’t an MSNBC poll.

Source is "National Exit Poll as Reported By MSNBC"

There is no such organization as "National Exit Poll." I like to know the truth, so I did a Google search. It was really quite simple. In other words, this is an MSNBC exit poll. On this one we have two choices. You are either lying or you are stupid. This is a matter of fact, not a "personal attack."

78 posted on 08/26/2009 10:43:01 AM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; ansel12
Let's look at election returns in the states where Catholics have a majority or large plurality: Rhode Island (64% Catholic), Massachusetts, New Jersey, Connecticut.

If Catholics voted like white Baptists, all of those states would be solidly Republican, and we would also probably do better in New York and PA as well.

79 posted on 08/26/2009 10:44:56 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
I admit when I'm wrong: The poll was from "National Election Pool," which compiles data from ABC, AP, CBS, CNN, Fox, NBC. So, five liberal news organizations that were openly in the tank for Obama against one ceter-right outfit that opposed him. Not the same as MSNBC, but not very many good track-records here either.

The only point worth discussing is still hanging over this coversation. A person is not a Catholic just becuase he or she thinks she is and tells a pollster so. That's a fact that a million polls won't change. Each one will be just as invalid as the last.

80 posted on 08/26/2009 10:51:46 AM PDT by presidio9 ("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson