Skip to comments.
New Study Finds 66 Percent Increased Breast Cancer Risk After Abortion
LifeNews.com ^
| July 28, 2009
| Steven Ertelt
Posted on 07/28/2009 12:45:45 PM PDT by julieee
New Study Finds 66 Percent Increased Breast Cancer Risk After Abortion
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- A new study done on women in Turkey who had abortions finds a 66 percent increased risk of contracting breast cancer as a result. The study is the latest to confirm that abortions cause significant adverse medical risks for women who have them, in addition to killing unborn children.
Full story and link to study at http://www.LifeNews.com/int1278.html
(Excerpt) Read more at LifeNews.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; breastcancer; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: SandWMan
Now, if it is true (which, if you haven’t guessed, I doubt...at least these high numbers anyway), I have no problem with offering this information, but I don’t think it is something that the pro-life movement should really hang its hat on.
21
posted on
07/28/2009 2:10:03 PM PDT
by
SandWMan
(While you may not be able to legislate morality, you can legislate morally.)
To: julieee
finds a 66 percent increased risk of contracting breast cancer as a result.No bias here, nosiree! Association does not prove causation.
22
posted on
07/28/2009 2:12:23 PM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(This is the worst economic crisis since Brittney Spears shaved both ends!)
To: SandWMan
I agree that abortion is never going to be stopped by attempting to connect it with a higher risk of breast cancer or anything else.
But it will be slowed down.
Seeing the heartbeat is the way for some.
Seeing the image is the way for some.
Seeing pictures of aborted babies on the sides of truck or billboards is the way for some.
Warning them of the dangers of breast cancer is the way to stop others.
To NOT use an arrow that God and science has presented us is wrong.
Multiple tactics, because everyone is different.
23
posted on
07/28/2009 2:29:23 PM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(Overproduction, one of the top five worries for the American farmer.)
To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Pro-Life PING Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
LIBERALISM IS THE WORST TYPE OF CANCER.
24
posted on
07/28/2009 5:44:17 PM PDT
by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available FREE at KnightsForLife.org)
To: julieee; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...
25
posted on
07/28/2009 6:36:36 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(Abortion, Euthanasia & FOCA - - don't Obama and the Democrats just kill ya!)
To: SandWMan
“True or not, this is NOT an argument to use to try to end abortion.”
Even if it is TRUE, you shouldn't mention it?
Well, let's get everyone smoking cigarettes and NEVER tell them it could cause cancer.
Don't be so idiotic.
Of course human beings should find abortion repugnant but many don't. If cancer was a possibility, then they may thing twice when something BAD might happen to THEM.
26
posted on
07/28/2009 8:00:26 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: nmh
Well, let's get everyone smoking cigarettes and NEVER tell them it could cause cancer. Democrats want to hide their health risks - while trumpeting ours...
27
posted on
07/28/2009 8:02:37 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: GOPJ
Actually it kills two birds with one stone. First the little human being dies and later dear mom dies if she is under Obama’s health scare plan. She'll need to meet with her “end of life counselor” and there's one less two less “carbon footprints”. They'll tell her not to be selfish and push for treatment when there are "scarce" medical resources.
28
posted on
07/28/2009 8:31:29 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: GOPJ
Actually it kills two birds with one stone. First the little human being dies and later dear mom dies if she is under Obama’s health scare plan. She'll need to meet with her “end of life counselor” and there's one less two less “carbon footprints”. They'll tell her not to be selfish and push for treatment when there are "scarce" medical resources.
29
posted on
07/28/2009 8:31:34 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY
You know, I am a four-year survivor of stage three breast cancer and I have almost none of the risk factors: Had first child when young, breast fed both kids, never overweight, never had a miscarriage, etc, etc.
I also never had an abortion. Now I have to worry about whispers behind my back that perhaps I did. I hate that.
30
posted on
07/29/2009 7:51:49 AM PDT
by
T Minus Four
(Abortion is not health care and it's not a benefit)
To: julieee
I gave up on this a long time ago. A lost cause. People for the most part do not care that abortion causes breast cancer. The best we can do is educate our families. The world has gone to heck.
31
posted on
07/29/2009 3:05:53 PM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson