Replies

Obama’s (finally published) birth certificate serial number is 151 1961 - 010641, he was born on 8-4-1961, and the certificate was filed by the Registrar on 8-8-1961 ( http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html )

Today, the Honolulu advertiser publishes a story, and at the bottom includes a set of long-form BC’s from a woman who had twins at Kapiolani on 8-5-1961 who went to school with Obama.

http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090728/NEWS01/907280345/Hawaii+officials+confirm+Obama%E2%80%99s+original+birth+certificate+still+exists

These twins were born the day AFTER Obama AT KAPIOLANI. And their certificate numbers are LOWER than his (10637 and 10638). They were born 8-5-1961, the certificates were signed by mom 8-7-1961, signed by the MD 8-11-1961, and signed by the Registrar 8-11-1961.

THIS MEANS HE DEFINITELY WAS NOT BORN AT KAPIOLANI, because his BC number (born on Aug 4th and filed with Registrar Aug 8th) should have a lower number than the twins (Born Aug 5th at Kapiolani and filed with Registrar Aug 11th)

115 posted on 07/28/2009 12:18:07 PM PDT by DinkyJackson

To: DinkyJackson

Today, the Honolulu advertiser publishes a story, and at the bottom includes a set of long-form BC’s from a woman who had twins at Kapiolani on 8-5-1961 who went to school with Obama. http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090728/NEWS01/907280345/Hawaii+officials+confirm+Obama%E2%80%99s+original+birth+certificate+still+exists These twins were born the day AFTER Obama AT KAPIOLANI. And their certificate numbers are LOWER than his (10637 and 10638). They were born 8-5-1961, the certificates were signed by mom 8-7-1961, signed by the MD 8-11-1961, and signed by the Registrar 8-11-1961. THIS MEANS HE DEFINITELY WAS NOT BORN AT KAPIOLANI, because his BC number (born on Aug 4th and filed with Registrar Aug 8th) should have a lower number than the twins (Born Aug 5th at Kapiolani and filed with Registrar Aug 11th)

Great catch Dinky!

120 posted on 07/28/2009 12:28:39 PM PDT by DouglasKC

To: DinkyJackson

Make this a new thread! It's more evidence that something is screwy.

121 posted on 07/28/2009 12:29:51 PM PDT by DouglasKC

To: DinkyJackson

That find increases the odds that OdumbO’s BC is a type 2.

126 posted on 07/28/2009 12:38:49 PM PDT by razorback-bert (We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.)

To: DinkyJackson

128 posted on 07/28/2009 12:39:42 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)

To: DinkyJackson

WOW!!! Great catch.

Make this a new thread please.

137 posted on 07/28/2009 1:10:15 PM PDT by Smokeyblue

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794