You are mixing things up. There is NO other statute that outlines Natural born citizen as it relates to the Constitution. But look for whatever you found and see what it says.
Again, Constitution and 14th Amendment
Do you understand that Hawaii was not a State that recognized Bigamy?
Do you understand that Obama Sr was already legally married by Kenyan law?
Therefore, NO LEGAL MARRIAGE IN HAWAII - IF one existed which may not have happened. YES, the divorce says there was a marriage. So what. The family lies. Let me see the marriage license application where Obama SR LIED punishable by prison.
The least I can do is send this thread back to the top...
Show me where the relevant Constitutional passage ever refers to marriage, as pertaining to the specific term of art “natural-born citizen.” It refers to parents, in the plural. That’s all.
Also, show me where the 14th amendment addresses this specific term of art, “natural-born citizen.” It doesn’t, because it can’t. That amendment had nothing to do with “natural-born citizen,” which only has Constitutional relevance in terms of eligibility, of the President and the Vice President. It is meaningless outside of that context. And, that is the only context that matters in this discussion.
Those three words, in combination, continue to have the specific meaning intended for them when the Constitution was ratified, RummyChick.