Over and over again you see people quote a law that pertains TO MARRIED parents that they use to determine that Obama is not a US citizen if born in Kenya.
That isn’t the right law to use. You have to use the out of wedlock part of the law. How hard is that to understand?
You don’t get to the natural born part of the citizenship if you can’t get to the first step. People are claiming he can’t be at the first step but they are using the wrong law.
GET IT?
If he is a US citizen with one US citizen parent but born on foreign soil then you get the next part of the argument which would have to be decided by a court of law. It will turn on interpreting the 14th amendment.
It is a multi layer stair step process.
If you can’t get it ..sorry..I can’t explain it better than that.
And please dont anyone ask me to proof Obama SR was already married. If posters don’t understand that then they really haven’t done the research. Here is an interview with the woman.
Thank you for finally spelling out just why you’ve been claiming this, though it seems to have chafed you to provide it.
The point is moot under the clear meaning of the term “natural-born citizen,” going back through Elg to Happersett to Bingham to John Jay to Vattel.
Please see: http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaNaturalBorn.htm for the specific cites behind this.