I have no idea..but a poster upthread made an interesting comment. Don’t know how he knows this:
To: SirJohnBarleycorn
The Hawaiian law does not embrace selective release. It countenances either release of “the record” or not.
This pronouncement doesn’t wash.
80 posted on Monday, July 27, 2009 9:39:47 PM by MortMan
I, too, think this is an important point. It may also hold the key to any further demands on our point, to wit: Somebody has opened the door, if only a little, just enough to allow the public access to only the information they wish the public to have. Failing full disclosure by Hawaiian Health officials, this amounts to little more than manipulation of a public record.
I am not sure of the legal status of this claim, but any moral person with common sense should realize they can’t simply allow what they wish the public to know from a public document once the door has been opened. Dr. Chiyome Fukino’s statement had to have been authorized by Barack Obama, himself, or she would have broken the law. Hawaiian Health officials must now release anything and everything they have, in whatever form they have it in, as a public record, as it relates to Barack Obama because Barack Obama has authorized its release himself.
I cannot believe someone who considers himself honorable enough to meet the requirements of Art. ll, Sec. l, Cl. 5 of the U.S. Constitution would ever endeavor to manipulate the now public record in such egregious and self-serving fashion.
ex animo
davidfarrar