Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The most important thing to understand here is that this is being recommended for our REGULAR health care even though the examples and models he uses were all for, pandemics, crises, emergency shortages or scarce organs for transplants.

The shortages here will be self-imposed by the government in order to create “social justice.”

The use of criteria such as youth and utilitarianism are reminiscent of "Life unworthy of life"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_unworthy_of_life

1 posted on 07/25/2009 12:59:35 PM PDT by dervish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dervish

Didn’t see the option that creates a system that has enough physicians to meet the demand.

Oh, forgot, that’s capitalism. Ptui-ptui.


2 posted on 07/25/2009 1:04:28 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dervish

“Rational” allocation can sound compelling or fascist, depending on one’s perspective. However, knowing our politicians the way we do, I think we should expect medical care to be given out like highway funds or tax breaks.


3 posted on 07/25/2009 1:06:39 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dervish
Some organ donation policies

Does anyone know if Obama carries a signed organ-donor card with him?

Regards,

4 posted on 07/25/2009 1:07:49 PM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dervish
"The shortages here will be self-imposed by the government in order to create 'social justice.'"

Based on the sections of the proposed health care deform legislation that I have read to date, I am forced to conclude that "social justice" means preference to underrepresented minorities.

This entire concept of "social justice" is foreign to me. We have a Constitution. That is my idea of justice.

5 posted on 07/25/2009 1:14:50 PM PDT by freespirited (Honk if you miss Licorice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dervish

Proper sequence:

1 - People who work in the private sector except lawyers.
2 - Private sector retirees.
3 - People who work in the public sector like cops or librarians. Appointees and elected officials not included in this category.
4 - Public sector retirees.
5 - People who have been on public assistance (excluding the above retirees) for more than two years.
6- Politicans (if not lawyers).
7- Lawyers.

My categories are based on a persons true worth to society. It is only measured by gainful contribution. People who do not contribute to society go to the back of the line. Professions that cause the greater harm go to the bottom.

If you don’t like it then don’t be a govt employee. Your choice. For the job security you give up preferences. Sorry.... not!


6 posted on 07/25/2009 1:39:19 PM PDT by Seruzawa (Obamalama lied, the republic died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dervish

I’ve read this article before. In a nutshell, it advocates allowing infants and old people to die, so that people who are productive to the State’s interests get preference.


7 posted on 07/25/2009 1:44:23 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dervish
Hard to believe that the once prestigious Brit medical journal Lancet would stoop so low to have an article like Zeke's published in it. The moral of the story is that once socialized medicine comes in - as it has in Britain - traditional Western medical ethics are inevitably corrupted.
8 posted on 07/25/2009 2:11:05 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dervish; Polarik; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; firebrand; Yaelle; LucyT; theothercheek; Lady GOP; ...
In 2006, there was a book published (by Regnery) titled "The Party of Death," referring to the Democrats. It was written by Ramesh Ponnuru of the National Review. The 'Rats were out of power then, so only now do we fully realize how poignant that title really was.
9 posted on 07/25/2009 2:29:28 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dervish
Promoting and rewarding social usefulness

I knew the useless eater tagline was coming....

10 posted on 07/25/2009 3:22:06 PM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dervish

If anyone wants the full PDF PM me with a direct e-mail address and I will send it to you.


14 posted on 07/26/2009 8:00:53 AM PDT by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dervish

HITLER reborn and the Gestapo applauding.


15 posted on 07/26/2009 8:45:59 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson