Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jpsb

I was not the person who used the word “treason.”

However, all of the people that I mentioned had the right and the duty to voice their objection to the election of Obama based on a belief that he was not eligible to hold office. Moreover, all of the people mentioned were involved in the process of electing Obama via the Electoral College.

For example, any one of the 50 governors could have withheld their state’s electoral votes, and any member of Congress could have objected when Dick Cheney moved to certify the election of Obama.


108 posted on 07/26/2009 12:18:44 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: trumandogz
The electoral college is winner take all, McCain/Palin won Alaska so governor Palin could not withhold any electoral college votes for Obama. And even had Alaska gone for Obama, it is the Secretary of States job to certify election results not the governors. And even if it was the governors job to certify results Sarah would have been impeached, jailed and nailed to a cross for trying it.

Dude you need to take a deep breath and slowly count to ten.

Sometime this crazy stuff is real (Nixon-watergate) sometimes it's not (Clinton white water). But stamping your feet and calling everyone a traitor is not helpful. WorldNetDaily is on the case as are a few other very resourceful people, if there is anything to this story and I think there is, it will be found out. One just can not hide 40 years.

109 posted on 07/26/2009 3:28:53 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson