Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

Alright..let’s back up a minute and rethink.

I think that those laws are presumed to talk about married people because there is a specific out of wedlock provision.

Seen here.
http://www.the-immigration-attorney.com/index.php?/Immigration-and-Nationality-Act/Section-309-INA-Children-born-out-of-wedlock-8-USC-1409.html

In otherwords, out of wedlock - this section

if not out of wedlock meaning married - another section

They don’t state the word married..but you gather that from the provision specifically addressing out of wedlock.

You have to read the statutes as a whole.


78 posted on 07/23/2009 7:38:58 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

No, this idea doesn’t make sense..it was NATIONALITY that I linked to.
Still don’t have an answer.


79 posted on 07/23/2009 7:41:45 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson